Inspec/Compendex Survey Thank you for helping us better understand your electronic resource needs. This survey regarding our trial of Inspec and our current Compendex subscription will only take a minute or two to complete. If you need more information about Inspec, Compendex, or this trial and review, please see the following Inspec & Compendex Information Sheet. Question Title * 1. Please tell us your status: UTC faculty or staff UTC undergraduate student UTC graduate student Library faculty or staff Other Question Title * 2. Please indicate how you used the information found in Inspec. You may select more than one. For research in support of a class assignment For use in the classroom or curriculum development For research in support of a journal article or professional presentation For research in support of a dissertation or thesis Other Question Title * 3. How satisfied are you with the following content aspects of Inspec? Unacceptable Mediocre Neutral Good Excellent Relevance of content to your needs Relevance of content to your needs Unacceptable Relevance of content to your needs Mediocre Relevance of content to your needs Neutral Relevance of content to your needs Good Relevance of content to your needs Excellent Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Unacceptable Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Mediocre Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Neutral Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Good Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Excellent Quality and completeness of individual records Quality and completeness of individual records Unacceptable Quality and completeness of individual records Mediocre Quality and completeness of individual records Neutral Quality and completeness of individual records Good Quality and completeness of individual records Excellent Timeliness of content Timeliness of content Unacceptable Timeliness of content Mediocre Timeliness of content Neutral Timeliness of content Good Timeliness of content Excellent Question Title * 4. How satisfied are you with the following technical aspects of Inspec? Unacceptable Mediocre Neutral Good Excellent Search features Search features Unacceptable Search features Mediocre Search features Neutral Search features Good Search features Excellent Navigation Navigation Unacceptable Navigation Mediocre Navigation Neutral Navigation Good Navigation Excellent Overall database design Overall database design Unacceptable Overall database design Mediocre Overall database design Neutral Overall database design Good Overall database design Excellent Speed Speed Unacceptable Speed Mediocre Speed Neutral Speed Good Speed Excellent Question Title * 5. Did you experience any technical problems while using Inspec? Question Title * 6. Based upon your experiences and needs, the library should... Continue its subscription to Compendex Drop Compendex and start a subscription to Inspec Other (please specify) Question Title * 7. Please explain your recommendation as to what the library should do (question 6) Question Title * 8. Although not required, we'd appreciate it if you could provide a little more information about which database performed better in the following areas: Compendex was better Inspec was better Same Don't know/No opinion Relevance of content to your needs Relevance of content to your needs Compendex was better Relevance of content to your needs Inspec was better Relevance of content to your needs Same Relevance of content to your needs Don't know/No opinion Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Compendex was better Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Inspec was better Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Same Quality of content (journals, conference proceedings, etc.) indexed Don't know/No opinion Quality and completeness of individual records Quality and completeness of individual records Compendex was better Quality and completeness of individual records Inspec was better Quality and completeness of individual records Same Quality and completeness of individual records Don't know/No opinion Timeliness of content Timeliness of content Compendex was better Timeliness of content Inspec was better Timeliness of content Same Timeliness of content Don't know/No opinion Search features Search features Compendex was better Search features Inspec was better Search features Same Search features Don't know/No opinion Navigation Navigation Compendex was better Navigation Inspec was better Navigation Same Navigation Don't know/No opinion Overall site design Overall site design Compendex was better Overall site design Inspec was better Overall site design Same Overall site design Don't know/No opinion Speed Speed Compendex was better Speed Inspec was better Speed Same Speed Don't know/No opinion Question Title * 9. Please include any additional comments that would be helpful as we consider this resource. Question Title * 10. May we contact you if we need more information?If NO, simply select the "Next" button and you're done! Name: Email address: Phone number: Next