5th National Spinal Cord Injury Conference - Pre-Course

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about this event?

At Toronto Rehab

On Toronto Rehab’s website

From a direct e-mail from Toronto Rehab

Received brochure in the mail

Directly from one of the presenters

ASIA Conference

University of Toronto - MED Newsletter

SYNAPSE Newsletter

CARP

CPA

OPA

GTA Rehab

ABI

CAOT

University of Toronto Faculty of Nursing

National Spinal Cord Injury Association

American Association of SCI Nurses

International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Demographics: Please indicate your current position?

Rehab/ Medical Advisor

Case Manager

Consumer

Fitness Trainer

Kinesiologist

Medical Doctor

Nurse Practitioner

Occupational Therapist

Occupational Therapy Assistant

Physiatrist

Physician

Physical Therapist

Physiotherapist

Physiotherapy Assistant

Psychologist

Professor / Assistant Proffessor

Registered Dietician

Registered Nurse

Researcher / Research Assistant

Social Worker

Student

Technologist

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate the keynote session, "What You Should Know about Toronto Rehabilitation Institute's Extraordinary iDAPT Facility That Could Help Your Research" by Dr. Geoff Fernie? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)

Comments

PLEASE ONLY COMPLETE THE WORKSHOPS YOU HAVE ATTENDED.

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate Workshop 1, "Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Restoring Voluntary Grasping Function"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Naaz Kapadia Desai 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vera Zivanovic 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Lorna Lo 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (YES)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (NO)

Comments

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate Workshop 2, "Measuring Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Functions in Individuals with SCI: Bridging the Gap between Research and Clinical Practice"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Ditor 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Rachel Brosseau 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julia Totosy de Zepetnek 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate Workshop 3, "Creating an Impact: Examining the Organizational Impact of an Event-Based Knowledge Translation Initiative to Promote Physical Activity to People with SCI"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather L. Gainforth 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Amy Latimer-Cheung 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Peter Athanasopoulos 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kathleen Martin Ginis 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate Workshop 4, "Strategies for Successful Implementation and Sustainability of Best Practices in SCI Rehabilitation"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Heather Flett 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jacquie Brown 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Anna Kras-Dupuis 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Marie-Therese Laramee 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Valerie Lamay 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Carol Scovil 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments