UGA - GROUP LEADER – Law School Orientation Evaluation 2022
UGA - GROUP LEADER – Law School Orientation Evaluation 2022
– Commission's Facebook Page
| 0.00%
0
|
– Commission's Twitter Feed
| 0.00%
0
|
– General E-mail from the Commission
| 53.33%
8
|
– State Bar E-News/Website
| 6.67%
1
|
– Law School E-mail/Website/Social Media (no personal contact)
| 13.33%
2
|
– Personal E-mail/Call from Law School Faculty/Administrator/Staff
| 13.33%
2
|
– Forwarded e-mail from a Friend
| 13.33%
2
|
| TOTAL | 15 |
Comments(0) | |
Overall, how would you rate each of the following:
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
1 - Poor
2 - Fair
3 - Average
4 - Good
5 - Excellent
General Format
for the
Professional...
Group Leader
Handbook
(Written...
Group Leader
Training
1 - Poor
– | 2 - Fair
– | 4 - Good
– | Total
– | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 53.33%
8
| 46.67%
7
|
15
|
– Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials)
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 20.00%
3
| 73.33%
11
|
15
|
– Group Leader Training
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 33.33%
5
| 66.67%
10
|
15
|
Comments(2) | ||||||
Please tell us how you felt about the information you received in the Group Leader Handbook (i.e. Written Materials):
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
1 - Poor
2 - Fair
3 - Average
4 - Good
5 - Excellent
Group Leader
Instructions
Information
about Student
Instructions
AgendaHypothetical
Descriptions
General Themes
(Requested
Talking Points)
A Lawyer's
Creed &
Aspirational...
Law School
Honor Code
References
Rules of
Professional
Conduct...
Character and
Fitness
References
1 - Poor
– | 2 - Fair
– | 4 - Good
– | Total
– | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Group Leader Instructions
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 26.67%
4
| 73.33%
11
|
15
|
– Information about Student Instructions
| 6.67%
1
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 40.00%
6
| 53.33%
8
|
15
|
– Agenda
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 28.57%
4
| 71.43%
10
|
14
|
– Hypothetical Descriptions
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 26.67%
4
| 66.67%
10
|
15
|
– General Themes (Requested Talking Points)
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 26.67%
4
| 73.33%
11
|
15
|
– A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 40.00%
6
| 53.33%
8
|
15
|
– Law School Honor Code References
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 0.00%
0
| 40.00%
6
| 53.33%
8
|
15
|
– Rules of Professional Conduct References
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 26.67%
4
| 66.67%
10
|
15
|
– Character and Fitness References
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 26.67%
4
| 66.67%
10
|
15
|
Comments(2) | ||||||
Please tell us how you felt about the information you received during the Group Leader TRAINING on the day of the Orientation, for each of the following:
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
1 - Poor
2 - Fair
3 - Average
4 - Good
5 - Excellent
Logistics
Information
Strategies for
Facilitating
the Break Ou...
Review of
Reference
Material
1 - Poor
– | 2 - Fair
– | 4 - Good
– | Total
– | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Logistics Information
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 20.00%
3
| 80.00%
12
|
15
|
– Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 13.33%
2
| 86.67%
13
|
15
|
– Review of Hypos
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 26.67%
4
| 73.33%
11
|
15
|
– Review of Reference Material
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 20.00%
3
| 80.00%
12
|
15
|
Comments(0) | ||||||
How would you rate the information you received about the room locations and names of student participants of your Break Out group?
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
1 - Poor
2 - Fair
3 - Average
4 - Good
5 - Excellent
(no label)
To the best of your knowledge, did all of the students in your Break Out Group have the Student Materials?
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
YesNo
– Yes
| 53.33%
8
|
– No
| 46.67%
7
|
| TOTAL | 15 |
Please indicate any hypothetical problems your group did NOT discuss and tell us why.
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
My Group
covered all of
the...
Problem 1 -
Unfair
Advantage?...
Problem 2 –
Confidentiality
(GroupMe Chat)
Problem 3 -
Social Behavior
("Briefs"...
Problem 4 -
Adderall
Problem 5 -
Social Media
Usage (Prof....
Problem 6 -
Plagiarism
– My Group covered all of the hypothetical problem
| 53.33%
8
|
– Problem 1 - Unfair Advantage? (Library Book)
| 0.00%
0
|
– Problem 2 – Confidentiality (GroupMe Chat)
| 0.00%
0
|
– Problem 3 - Social Behavior ("Briefs" Comment)
| 0.00%
0
|
– Problem 4 - Adderall
| 0.00%
0
|
– Problem 5 - Social Media Usage (Prof. Lee and Vaccines)
| 6.67%
1
|
– Problem 6 - Plagiarism
| 46.67%
7
|
| Total Respondents: 15 | |
Comments(8) | |
Of the hypothetical problems your group discussed, which hypothetical problems did you think were MOST EFFECTIVE for teaching professionalism? (1 is MOST Effective and 6 is LEAST Effective; Select "N/A" if your Group did not discuss a particular hypothetical problem)
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
Problem 1 -
Unfair
Advantage?...
Problem 2 –
Confidentiality
(GroupMe Chat)
Problem 3 -
Social Behavior
("Briefs"...
Problem 4 -
Adderall
Problem 5 -
Social Media
Usage (Colle...
Problem 6 -
Plagiarism
1
– | 2
– | 3
– | 4
– | 5
– | 6
– | N/A
– | Total
– | Score
– | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Problem 1 - Unfair Advantage? (Library Book)
| 20.00%
3
| 26.67%
4
| 13.33%
2
| 6.67%
1
| 20.00%
3
| 13.33%
2
| 0.00%
0
|
15
|
3.80
|
– Problem 2 – Confidentiality (GroupMe Chat)
| 33.33%
5
| 26.67%
4
| 13.33%
2
| 6.67%
1
| 20.00%
3
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
|
15
|
4.47
|
– Problem 3 - Social Behavior ("Briefs" Comment)
| 20.00%
3
| 20.00%
3
| 26.67%
4
| 26.67%
4
| 6.67%
1
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
|
15
|
4.20
|
– Problem 4 - Adderall
| 6.67%
1
| 20.00%
3
| 40.00%
6
| 26.67%
4
| 6.67%
1
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
|
15
|
3.93
|
– Problem 5 - Social Media Usage (College Cheating Scandal)
| 20.00%
3
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 33.33%
5
| 20.00%
3
| 13.33%
2
| 6.67%
1
|
15
|
3.21
|
– Problem 6 - Plagiarism
| 0.00%
0
| 6.67%
1
| 0.00%
0
| 0.00%
0
| 20.00%
3
| 40.00%
6
| 33.33%
5
|
15
|
1.70
|
Why did you consider the hypothetical problem you selected as MOST EFFECTIVE to be the most effective problem for teaching professionalism?
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
The group really seemed to appreciate the nuance in it, how there were several different perspectives because of the number of people involved and their role.
8/24/2022
03:14 PM
Most discussion. No rules to rely upon. Makes them think outside of their experiences. They know they have a duty to the possible victim. Not all think about a duty to the person who made the comment.
8/19/2022
04:34 PM
Robust discussion
8/19/2022
12:31 PM
Provides an opportunity to talk about the different duties owed to different people in a realistic setting. Fosters a lot of discussion amongst the students.
8/19/2022
12:19 PM
The question contained three layers involving (1) ethics, (2) professionalism, and (3) technology and innovation. In turn, it allowed the us to discuss different consequences of unfair advantage (i.e. hypothetical #1) through the capacities of several different parties to the hypothetical (i.e., Miranda, section A students, and section B students). Because of this, a more comprehensive discussion was possible.
Lastly, the hypothetical also allowed for students to think about technological competence and confidentiality on certain platforms (i.e., groupme, listserv, etc.).
8/19/2022
03:32 AM
It generated a lot of discussion.
8/18/2022
08:07 PM
Confidentiality
8/13/2022
09:43 PM
It seemed particularly relevant and elicited good conversation
8/13/2022
02:28 AM
Group discussion
8/12/2022
08:30 PM
Why did you consider the hypothetical problem you selected as LEAST EFFECTIVE to be the least effective problem for teaching professionalism?
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
The plagiarism one is too simple. the text was verbatim plagiarized. This is an important topic but needs to be developed a little more to make it harder to decide if the student improperly copied another's work.
8/24/2022
03:14 PM
Because there are hard and fast rules to guide them. Professionalism is what we should do but they rely on the rules telling them what they must do.
8/19/2022
04:34 PM
Too obvious;
Little helpful discussion followed
8/19/2022
12:31 PM
The answers here are generally pretty clear, and talking about drugs leads to a lot of tangential comments.
8/19/2022
12:19 PM
The professional and legal consequences of adderall use seemed to be clear to the students.
8/19/2022
03:32 AM
I don't think the social media hypo dealt with college cheating, but in any event there was not much interaction on that one.
8/18/2022
08:07 PM
Coursebook
8/13/2022
09:43 PM
It was still good, but a little dated
8/13/2022
02:28 AM
The group didn’t have differences of opinion
8/12/2022
08:30 PM
For 2023 (next year), how much advance notice of a SAVE THE DATE would you like from the Commission or the Law School if you are selected to serve as a Group Leader?
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
4+ weeks3 weeks2 weeks1 week
– 4+ weeks
| 86.67%
13
|
– 3 weeks
| 13.33%
2
|
– 2 weeks
| 0.00%
0
|
– 1 week
| 0.00%
0
|
| TOTAL | 15 |
Comments(2) | |
For 2023 (next year), how far in advance would you like to receive the Group Leader Materials
- Answered: 15
- Skipped: 0
14 days10 days7 days
Friday Before
the Orientation
even if less...
At least one
business day in
advance
– 14 days
| 33.33%
5
|
– 10 days
| 13.33%
2
|
– 7 days
| 46.67%
7
|
– Friday Before the Orientation even if less than 7 days
| 6.67%
1
|
– At least one business day in advance
| 0.00%
0
|
| TOTAL | 15 |
Comments(2) | |
How could the professionalism orientation be improved?
- Answered: 13
- Skipped: 2
The hypotheticals largely focused on law school issues, I would like to see another hypothetical related to practicing law. Also, another 15 minutes in the group breakout sessions would help ensure discussions are not rushed.
8/24/2022
03:14 PM
I think they should have at least one hypo that gives that shows them what professionalism challenges attorneys face. They are going to school to be attorneys. They should see that. The current hypos certainly prepare them to act as professionals as students. I do not think they current hypos prepare them to act as professionals when they become attorneys.
8/19/2022
04:34 PM
I’d rethink using hypo 6
8/19/2022
12:31 PM
Other than more time with the students, I can't think of anything. It's a great program.
8/19/2022
12:19 PM
Hosting a zoom training session for volunteers prior to the orientation or laying out suggested time limits for each hypothetical to help the group leaders get through all of the hypotheticals.
8/19/2022
03:32 AM
Great
8/13/2022
09:43 PM
Great as it is
8/12/2022
08:30 PM
Have a hypothetical dealing a lawyers professional issue
8/12/2022
08:29 PM
It’s good as is
8/12/2022
08:28 PM
Please provide any other general suggestions or comments you have about the professionalism orientation.
- Answered: 12
- Skipped: 3
This was a great experience and I hope to do it again next year. It might also be useful for 3L's to get their own program in spring semester before graduation to start thinking about issues that will be coming their way once they start practicing law.
8/24/2022
03:14 PM
More time for the breakout sessions to discuss hypotheticals, 10 minutes is not enough for everyone to weigh in on every hypothetical. This year, we got a core group who really wanted to talk about every hypo and a larger group who were content to keep quiet. I think there are useful to also give the students a little taste of what their actual classes will be like.
8/19/2022
04:34 PM
Na
8/19/2022
12:31 PM
It would further the goals of the committee to incorporate some of the varying levels of discipline that can be taken in response to certain conduct (i.e., consequences for unethical conduct vs consequences for unprofessional conduct).
8/19/2022
03:32 AM
None
8/13/2022
09:43 PM
None
8/12/2022
08:30 PM
More time would be helpful 10 minutes flies by.
8/12/2022
08:29 PM
N/a
8/12/2022
08:28 PM
More professional examples and less academic ones.
8/12/2022
08:04 PM
Your Name (Optional if you don't mind us contacting you if we have any follow-up questions about your responses).
- Answered: 9
- Skipped: 6
Bert Noble
8/24/2022
03:14 PM
Thomas Walker
8/19/2022
04:34 PM
Adam L. Hebbard
8/19/2022
12:19 PM
Christopher Brock
8/19/2022
03:32 AM
Michael Eshman
8/13/2022
02:28 AM
Scott Cahalan
8/12/2022
08:30 PM
Thomas Walker
8/12/2022
08:29 PM
Ben Pearlman
8/12/2022
08:28 PM
Tina Roddenbery
8/12/2022
08:04 PM
Powered by
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!
Invite others to add a comment
Add a comment
Hide comments
Sign up for a free account. Ask your own questions and make confident decisions.
Close