Orthopaedic Research Day 2016

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Orthopaedic Research Day course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Discuss the current research developments in every subspecialty of orthopaedics including joint reconstruction, shoulder & elbow, trauma, foot & ankle, spine, upper extremity, oncology and sports.	Discuss the current research developments in every subspecialty of orthopaedics including joint reconstruction, shoulder & elbow, trauma, foot & ankle, spine, upper extremity, oncology and sports. Significantly Met	Discuss the current research developments in every subspecialty of orthopaedics including joint reconstruction, shoulder & elbow, trauma, foot & ankle, spine, upper extremity, oncology and sports. Somewhat Met	Discuss the current research developments in every subspecialty of orthopaedics including joint reconstruction, shoulder & elbow, trauma, foot & ankle, spine, upper extremity, oncology and sports. Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION I: JOINTS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population?	Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population? Excellent	Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population? Very Good	Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population? Good	Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population? Fair	Adam Sadler, DO - Does Discharge Disposition Affect the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis in the Knee Arthroplasty Patient Population? Poor
Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities	Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities Excellent	Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities Very Good	Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities Good	Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities Fair	Ke Xie, MD - Soft Tissue Releases in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformities Poor
William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction	William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction Excellent	William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction Very Good	William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction Good	William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction Fair	William Baione, MD - Periarticular Injection (PIA) After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivicaine vs a Traditional Bupivicaine Cocktail: Pain Control and its Effect on HCAHPS Scores and Patient Satisfaction Poor
Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients	Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients Excellent	Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients Very Good	Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients Good	Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients Fair	Jacob Conjeski, MD - Complications, Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates Do Not Increase Linearly With Age after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of 22,656 Patients Poor
T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management	T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management Excellent	T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management Very Good	T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management Good	T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management Fair	T. Kyle Stoops, MD - Retrospective Investigation of Failed Metal on metal Total Hip Replacements: A Guide to Management Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION II: SHOULDER & ELBOW

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution	Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution Excellent	Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution Very Good	Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution Good	Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution Fair	Jonathan Clark, MD - The Influence of Patient and Surgeon-Specific Factors on Operative Duration and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Teaching Institution Poor
Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes	Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Excellent	Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Very Good	Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Good	Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Fair	Jonathan Streit, MD - Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Treated with Shoulder Arthroplasty: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Poor
Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65	Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65 Excellent	Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65 Very Good	Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65 Good	Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65 Fair	Jesse Allert, MD - Decision Making and Outcomes: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair in the Surgical Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears without Arthritis in Patients Older than 65 Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers Session III: TRAUMA

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact	Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact Excellent	Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact Very Good	Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact Good	Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact Fair	Jonathan Quade, MD - Symptomatic Ilio-Sacral Screw Removal Following Pelvic Trauma- Incidence and Clinical Impact Poor
Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures	Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures Excellent	Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures Very Good	Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures Good	Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures Fair	Michael Beebe, MD - OTA Classification is Highly Predictive of Acute ACS Following Tibia Fracture: A Cohort of 2885 Fractures Poor
Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter?	Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter? Excellent	Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter? Very Good	Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter? Good	Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter? Fair	Katie Crum, MD - Optimizing Fixation of Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures (AO/OTA 43-A): Does the Fibula Matter? Poor
Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model	Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model Excellent	Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model Very Good	Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model Good	Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model Fair	Seth Cooper, MD - Comparison of Femoral Head Rotation and Varus Collapse Between a Single Lag Screw and Integrated Dual Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Device Using a Novel Chair Rise Biomechanical Model Poor
Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement	Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement Excellent	Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement Very Good	Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement Good	Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement Fair	Darryl Auston, MD - Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union without Displacement Poor
Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures	Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures Excellent	Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures Very Good	Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures Good	Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures Fair	Rafael Serrano-Riera, MD - Nasal Decolonization with Povidone-iodine Decreases Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly with Intracapsular Femur Fractures Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION IV: SPINE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease	Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease Excellent	Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease Very Good	Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease Good	Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease Fair	Michael Lago, MD - Early Outcomes and Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing a "Hybrid" Lumbar Disc Replacement and Fusion for the Treatment of Multi-Level Lumbar Disc Disease Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers:
Dr. Phillip Spiegel Memorial Visiting Professor- Dr. John Callaghan, MD

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement	John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement Excellent	John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement Very Good	John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement Good	John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement Fair	John Callaghan, MD - Why Did We Leave Charnley Hip Replacement Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION V: FOOT & ANKLE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet	William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet Excellent	William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet Very Good	William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet Good	William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet Fair	William Crawford, MD - Intermediate-term Follow Up for the Modified Mau Osteotomy for the Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Study of 190 Feet Poor
James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws	James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws Excellent	James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws Very Good	James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws Good	James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws Fair	James Head, MD - Midfoot Fusion: Plates vs Screws Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VI: UPPER EXTREMITY

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty	Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty Excellent	Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty Very Good	Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty Good	Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty Fair	Brandon Frye, MD - Closed Wound Drainage in Shoulder Arthoplasty Poor
Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft	Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft Excellent	Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft Very Good	Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft Good	Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft Fair	Brentley Taylor, MD - Mixed Motor and Sensory Peripheral Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft vs Autograft Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthpaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VII: ONCOLOGY

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction	Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Excellent	Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Very Good	Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Good	Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Fair	Shaun Accardo, MD, MSK - Outcomes of the Quadriceps-Sparing Lateral Approach to the Distal Femur for Tumor Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VIII: SPORTS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique	Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique Excellent	Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique Very Good	Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique Good	Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique Fair	Tamira Miranowski, DO - Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Biceps Tenodesis technique Poor
Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis	Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Excellent	Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Very Good	Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Good	Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Fair	Eildar Abyar, MD - Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button vs Unicortical Button with Adjunction of Suture Anchor for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Poor

Question Title

* 19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 22. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 23. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 24. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 7.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For the purpose of recertification, the following organizations accept AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TMfrom organizations accredited by the ACCME.

American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA)

American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

American Academy of Neurosurgeons (AANS)

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 7.75) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Orthopaedic Research Day course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION I: JOINTS

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION II: SHOULDER & ELBOW

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers Session III: TRAUMA

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION IV: SPINE

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers:Dr. Phillip Spiegel Memorial Visiting Professor- Dr. John Callaghan, MD

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION V: FOOT & ANKLE

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION VI: UPPER EXTREMITY

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthpaedic Research Day speakersSESSION VII: ONCOLOGY

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakersSESSION VIII: SPORTS

Question Title

* 19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 22. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 23. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Orthopaedic Research Day course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION I: JOINTS

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION II: SHOULDER & ELBOW

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION IV: SPINE

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers:
Dr. Phillip Spiegel Memorial Visiting Professor- Dr. John Callaghan, MD

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION V: FOOT & ANKLE

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VI: UPPER EXTREMITY

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthpaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VII: ONCOLOGY

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Orthopaedic Research Day speakers
SESSION VIII: SPORTS