We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do.
We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do. Strongly Favor
We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do. Somewhat Favor
We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do. Somewhat Oppose
We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do. Strongly Oppose
We should tax soft drinks and other sugary beverages that contribute to health problems, EVEN IF this means the government is acting like the “Nanny State,” telling us what we can and can’t do. Not Sure
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education.
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education. Strongly Favor
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education. Somewhat Favor
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education. Somewhat Oppose
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education. Strongly Oppose
The government should increase federal nutrition and food-assistance programs, EVEN IF it means cutting back on what we spend on other important areas, such as education. Not Sure
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices.
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices. Strongly Favor
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices. Somewhat Favor
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices. Somewhat Oppose
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices. Strongly Oppose
Schools, colleges, and other public institutions should include regional and cultural food options (like Southern fried chicken), EVEN IF they aren’t always the healthiest choices. Not Sure
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Strongly Favor
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Somewhat Favor
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Somewhat Oppose
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Strongly Oppose
In order to keep food affordable, we should use farming methods that provide the highest yield at the lowest cost, EVEN IF it means using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Not Sure
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components.
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components. Strongly Favor
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components. Somewhat Favor
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components. Somewhat Oppose
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components. Strongly Oppose
To reduce food waste in landfills, cities should establish mandatory curbside food-compost pickup programs, EVEN IF people find it inconvenient to separate their trash into various components. Not Sure
