July 8th Data Boot Camp Post-Session Survey

To help us improve our bi-annual sessions, we hope you will take a few minutes to provide your feedback on the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared. Thank you!

Question Title

* Organization

AIR

CCEE

CDE

Education Northwest

HCOE

Inform to Inspire

MCOE

RTI

SBE

Teacher Development Network

WestEd

Question Title

* How would you rate the QUALITY of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Is the session well-structured and designed? Does the session present content in an effective and engaging way that is easy to follow? Is the information/guidance/tool rooted in research or evidence-based best practices?

Very low quality – Poorly designed and hard to follow; information is inaccurate or outdated

Low quality – Hard to follow; information is mostly inaccurate or outdated

Somewhat low quality – Unclear whether valid or effective; some information is inaccurate or outdated, but mostly inconsequential

Somewhat high quality – Seems to be grounded in research and/or evidence-based practices; mostly accurate and up-to-date

High quality – Engaging, well-designed, and easy to navigate; grounded in research and/or evidence-based practices

Very high quality – Very engaging and easy to follow; thoughtfully designed and developed; grounded in up-to-date research and/or evidence-based best practices

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the QUALITY of information, guidance, and/or tools shared in this session?

Question Title

* How would you rate the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need?

Very low relevance – Does not state purpose or intended audience; addresses a need that does not exist

Low relevance – Purpose and intended audience unclear; aligns to an issue or topic that is not particularly relevant

Somewhat low relevance – Purpose unclear; overly broad audience; addresses a generally acknowledged need

Somewhat high relevance – Clear purpose; overly broad audience; aligns to a relevant issue or topic

High relevance – Clear purpose; tailored to specific audience; timely in addressing a relevant issue, topic, or need

Very high relevance – Clearly defined purpose; tailored to specific audience and context; addresses a highly relevant and urgent issue, topic, or need

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Question Title

* How would you rate the USABILITY of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Is the information shared structured in a way that minimizes the need to make adjustments? Can the information shared be immediately applied or implemented? Is the information shared applicable in multiple and diverse settings? Is the information shared accessible to all users in the intended audience? Does the information shared provide a comprehensive understanding of the content without overwhelming the user?

Very low usability – Cannot use or access this information

Low usability – Difficult to apply; requires a lot of adaptations to be used or accessed

Somewhat low usability – Can only be applied or accessed by some users

Somewhat high usability – Can be applied and accessed by most users with a few adaptations

High usability – Can be applied immediately and accessed by most users

Very high usability – Well-structured and comprehensive; can be applied immediately as is and accessed by all users

July 8th Data Boot Camp Post-Session Survey

Question Title

* Organization

Question Title

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the QUALITY of information, guidance, and/or tools shared in this session?

Question Title

* How would you rate the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need?

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Question Title

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the USABILITY of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Question Title

* Do you have any additional feedback for future sessions?

Question Title

* What is a helpful next step to continue your program evaluation work?

July 8th Data Boot Camp Post-Session Survey

Question Title

* Organization

Question Title

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the QUALITY of information, guidance, and/or tools shared in this session?

Question Title

* How would you rate the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need?

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Question Title

Question Title

* What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the USABILITY of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Question Title

* Do you have any additional feedback for future sessions?

Question Title

* What is a helpful next step to continue your program evaluation work?

* How would you rate the RELEVANCE of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?

Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need?