July 8th Data Boot Camp Post-Session Survey
To help us improve our bi-annual sessions, we hope you will take a few minutes to provide your feedback on the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared. Thank you!
*
Organization
(Required.)
AIR
CCEE
CDE
Education Northwest
HCOE
Inform to Inspire
MCOE
RTI
SBE
Teacher Development Network
WestEd
*
How would you rate the
QUALITY
of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?
Is the session well-structured and designed? Does the session present content in an effective and engaging way that is easy to follow? Is the information/guidance/tool rooted in research or evidence-based best practices?
(Required.)
Very low quality
– Poorly designed and hard to follow; information is inaccurate or outdated
Low quality
– Hard to follow; information is mostly inaccurate or outdated
Somewhat low quality
– Unclear whether valid or effective; some information is inaccurate or outdated, but mostly inconsequential
Somewhat high quality
– Seems to be grounded in research and/or evidence-based practices; mostly accurate and up-to-date
High quality
– Engaging, well-designed, and easy to navigate; grounded in research and/or evidence-based practices
Very high quality
– Very engaging and easy to follow; thoughtfully designed and developed; grounded in up-to-date research and/or evidence-based best practices
What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the
QUALITY
of information, guidance, and/or tools shared in this session?
*
How would you rate the
RELEVANCE
of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?
Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need?
(Required.)
Very low relevance
– Does not state purpose or intended audience; addresses a need that does not exist
Low relevance
– Purpose and intended audience unclear; aligns to an issue or topic that is not particularly relevant
Somewhat low relevance
– Purpose unclear; overly broad audience; addresses a generally acknowledged need
Somewhat high relevance
– Clear purpose; overly broad audience; aligns to a relevant issue or topic
High relevance
– Clear purpose; tailored to specific audience; timely in addressing a relevant issue, topic, or need
Very high relevance
– Clearly defined purpose; tailored to specific audience and context; addresses a highly relevant and urgent issue, topic, or need
What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the
RELEVANCE
of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?
*
How would you rate the
USABILITY
of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?
Is the information shared structured in a way that minimizes the need to make adjustments? Can the information shared be immediately applied or implemented? Is the information shared applicable in multiple and diverse settings? Is the information shared accessible to all users in the intended audience? Does the information shared provide a comprehensive understanding of the content without overwhelming the user?
(Required.)
Very low usability
– Cannot use or access this information
Low usability
– Difficult to apply; requires a lot of adaptations to be used or accessed
Somewhat low usability
– Can only be applied or accessed by some users
Somewhat high usability
– Can be applied and accessed by most users with a few adaptations
High usability
– Can be applied immediately and accessed by most users
Very high usability
– Well-structured and comprehensive; can be applied immediately as is and accessed by all users
What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the
USABILITY
of the information, guidance, and/or tools that were shared in this session?
Do you have any additional feedback for future sessions?
What is a helpful next step to continue your program evaluation work?
1 / 1
100%
