A. Use an ahupua'a (comprehensive ridge to reef) approach to watershed management
A. Use an ahupua'a (comprehensive ridge to reef) approach to watershed management Agree
A. Use an ahupua'a (comprehensive ridge to reef) approach to watershed management Disagree
A. Use an ahupua'a (comprehensive ridge to reef) approach to watershed management No opinion or not sure
B. Expand programs to control invasive and nonnative plants and ungulates (pigs, deer, etc.) and expand reforestation measures (existing County Dept. of Water Supply program)
B. Expand programs to control invasive and nonnative plants and ungulates (pigs, deer, etc.) and expand reforestation measures (existing County Dept. of Water Supply program) Agree
B. Expand programs to control invasive and nonnative plants and ungulates (pigs, deer, etc.) and expand reforestation measures (existing County Dept. of Water Supply program) Disagree
B. Expand programs to control invasive and nonnative plants and ungulates (pigs, deer, etc.) and expand reforestation measures (existing County Dept. of Water Supply program) No opinion or not sure
C. Expand watershed protection to lower elevations (the County Dept. of Water Supply program focuses on upper watersheds, while lower watersheds also affect ground and surface water)
C. Expand watershed protection to lower elevations (the County Dept. of Water Supply program focuses on upper watersheds, while lower watersheds also affect ground and surface water) Agree
C. Expand watershed protection to lower elevations (the County Dept. of Water Supply program focuses on upper watersheds, while lower watersheds also affect ground and surface water) Disagree
C. Expand watershed protection to lower elevations (the County Dept. of Water Supply program focuses on upper watersheds, while lower watersheds also affect ground and surface water) No opinion or not sure
D. Increase funding and involvement by state and non-county water system providers in watershed protection partnerships and reforestation programs (County Dept. of Water Supply currently provide significant funding)
D. Increase funding and involvement by state and non-county water system providers in watershed protection partnerships and reforestation programs (County Dept. of Water Supply currently provide significant funding) Agree
D. Increase funding and involvement by state and non-county water system providers in watershed protection partnerships and reforestation programs (County Dept. of Water Supply currently provide significant funding) Disagree
D. Increase funding and involvement by state and non-county water system providers in watershed protection partnerships and reforestation programs (County Dept. of Water Supply currently provide significant funding) No opinion or not sure
E. Water providers should fund watershed management programs in proportion to the benefits on groundwater recharge
E. Water providers should fund watershed management programs in proportion to the benefits on groundwater recharge Agree
E. Water providers should fund watershed management programs in proportion to the benefits on groundwater recharge Disagree
E. Water providers should fund watershed management programs in proportion to the benefits on groundwater recharge No opinion or not sure
F. Water providers should fund watershed management programs with broader ECOLOGICAL benefits, even if groundwater recharge benefits are less direct
F. Water providers should fund watershed management programs with broader ECOLOGICAL benefits, even if groundwater recharge benefits are less direct Agree
F. Water providers should fund watershed management programs with broader ECOLOGICAL benefits, even if groundwater recharge benefits are less direct Disagree
F. Water providers should fund watershed management programs with broader ECOLOGICAL benefits, even if groundwater recharge benefits are less direct No opinion or not sure
G. Consult with the Native Hawaiian community, Mokus, and local experts on watershed resource management
G. Consult with the Native Hawaiian community, Mokus, and local experts on watershed resource management Agree
G. Consult with the Native Hawaiian community, Mokus, and local experts on watershed resource management Disagree
G. Consult with the Native Hawaiian community, Mokus, and local experts on watershed resource management No opinion or not sure
H. Near drinking water wells, restrict land uses that have a high risk of well contamination (a 'wellhead protection ordinance' based on well capture zones is proposed)
H. Near drinking water wells, restrict land uses that have a high risk of well contamination (a 'wellhead protection ordinance' based on well capture zones is proposed) Agree
H. Near drinking water wells, restrict land uses that have a high risk of well contamination (a 'wellhead protection ordinance' based on well capture zones is proposed) Disagree
H. Near drinking water wells, restrict land uses that have a high risk of well contamination (a 'wellhead protection ordinance' based on well capture zones is proposed) No opinion or not sure
I. Maximize groundwater recharge during non-drought periods to stabilize supply (reduce pumping, increase use of surface and alternative water sources, require aggressive conservation)
I. Maximize groundwater recharge during non-drought periods to stabilize supply (reduce pumping, increase use of surface and alternative water sources, require aggressive conservation) Agree
I. Maximize groundwater recharge during non-drought periods to stabilize supply (reduce pumping, increase use of surface and alternative water sources, require aggressive conservation) Disagree
I. Maximize groundwater recharge during non-drought periods to stabilize supply (reduce pumping, increase use of surface and alternative water sources, require aggressive conservation) No opinion or not sure
J. Increase funding for scientific studies of hydro-geologic and ecological conditions to support decision making
J. Increase funding for scientific studies of hydro-geologic and ecological conditions to support decision making Agree
J. Increase funding for scientific studies of hydro-geologic and ecological conditions to support decision making Disagree
J. Increase funding for scientific studies of hydro-geologic and ecological conditions to support decision making No opinion or not sure
K. Use drought conditions as the baseline for determining water supply availability (average climate conditions are currently used, drought conditions are more cautious)
K. Use drought conditions as the baseline for determining water supply availability (average climate conditions are currently used, drought conditions are more cautious) Agree
K. Use drought conditions as the baseline for determining water supply availability (average climate conditions are currently used, drought conditions are more cautious) Disagree
K. Use drought conditions as the baseline for determining water supply availability (average climate conditions are currently used, drought conditions are more cautious) No opinion or not sure
L. Do not allow new stream diversions for non-instream uses until numerical 'instream flow standards' are adopted by the State
L. Do not allow new stream diversions for non-instream uses until numerical 'instream flow standards' are adopted by the State Agree
L. Do not allow new stream diversions for non-instream uses until numerical 'instream flow standards' are adopted by the State Disagree
L. Do not allow new stream diversions for non-instream uses until numerical 'instream flow standards' are adopted by the State No opinion or not sure