2023 SPE TPO Global Automotive Conference Question Title * 1. Which of the following categories best fits your company? Automotive OEM Tier 1/2/3 Part or Component Manufacturer and Supplier Resin Producer/Supplier Material Compound Supplier Raw Materials Supplier (Other than Resins and Compounds) Equipment/Tooling Supplier CAE or Other Supplier Testing Provider Academia Research Institute Media Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. Please indicate your participation status at the 2023 Conference.(Select all that apply) Attendee Speaker Sponsor Exhibitor Conference Planning Committee Member SPE Detroit Section Member SPE Automotive Division Board Member Student Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. How did you find out about the 2023 Conference? Already knew about it from previous attendance "Word of Mouth" from Industry Contact Emailed E-Blasts Social Media Postings (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Trade Journal Advertisement Other SPE Event where it was posted Google Search Other (please specify) Question Title * 4. Is this the first year you participated in any capacity at the Conference? Yes No Question Title * 5. Please rate the effectiveness of the promotional communication used to advertise the 2023 Conference - answer any or all that apply Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) Unacceptable - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) Poor - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) Adequate - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) Good - Conference Website (www.auto-tpo.com) Excellent - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Unacceptable - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Poor - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Adequate - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Good - Social Media (i.e. LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.) Excellent - Emailed E-Blasts - Emailed E-Blasts Unacceptable - Emailed E-Blasts Poor - Emailed E-Blasts Adequate - Emailed E-Blasts Good - Emailed E-Blasts Excellent - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events Unacceptable - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events Poor - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events Adequate - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events Good - Traditional Advertising in other Publications or other SPE Events Excellent Question Title * 6. 1. Please rate the ease and effectiveness of the 2023 Conference registration process. o Unacceptable o Poor o Adequate o Good o Excellent Question Title * 7. 1. Please rate the value of attending the Conference vs. the cost to attend (Registration Fees). Poor or Below Average Value Good Value High Value Any additional comments or suggestions Question Title * 8. If you are an Exhibitor (or Exhibiting Sponsor), please rate the overall value of the Conference vs. sponsorship or exhibitor costs Poor or Below Average Value Good Value High Value Any additional comments or suggestions Question Title * 9. 1. Please enter the date for which you are providing feedback (All that apply) Monday – October 2 Tuesday – October 3 Wednesday – October 4 Question Title * 10. How do you rate the Keynote Speakers? Unacceptable Poor Fair/Adequate Good Excellent Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Unacceptable Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Poor Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Fair/Adequate Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Good Monday - Drew Winter - Informa Tech Automotive Group Excellent Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Unacceptable Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Poor Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Fair/Adequate Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Good Tuesday - Manoj Patnala - Rivian Excellent Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Unacceptable Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Poor Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Fair/Adequate Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Good Tuesday - Gustavo Lombardi - Braskem Excellent Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Unacceptable Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Poor Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Fair/Adequate Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Good Wednesday - Manojdeep Jasrotia - Caresoft Global Excellent Other (please specify) Question Title * 11. Forum/Panel Discussion Feedback Poor Value Adequate Good Excellent Value GM-led Sustainability Panel Discussion GM-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Poor Value GM-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Adequate GM-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Good GM-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Excellent Value RIVIAN-led Sustainability Panel Discussion RIVIAN-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Poor Value RIVIAN-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Adequate RIVIAN-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Good RIVIAN-led Sustainability Panel Discussion Excellent Value Executive Marketing Forum Executive Marketing Forum Poor Value Executive Marketing Forum Adequate Executive Marketing Forum Good Executive Marketing Forum Excellent Value Comments regarding Forum/Panel rating feedback: Question Title * 12. 1. Please rate the following aspects of the Technical Sessions that you attended today: Unacceptable Poor Fair/Adequate Good Excellent Number of Sessions Offered Today Number of Sessions Offered Today Unacceptable Number of Sessions Offered Today Poor Number of Sessions Offered Today Fair/Adequate Number of Sessions Offered Today Good Number of Sessions Offered Today Excellent Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Unacceptable Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Poor Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Fair/Adequate Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Good Relevance of the Sessions Offered Today Excellent Number of Papers per Session Number of Papers per Session Unacceptable Number of Papers per Session Poor Number of Papers per Session Fair/Adequate Number of Papers per Session Good Number of Papers per Session Excellent Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Unacceptable Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Poor Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Fair/Adequate Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Good Relevance of the Papers presented in each Session Excellent Comments regarding Technical Sessions: Question Title * 13. Please indicate the Technical Sessions that you attended today. Check each applicable Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Sustainability Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Process Enabling & Additive Manufacturing Innovations in Interiors Material Development Performance Additives & Colorants Question Title * 14. 1. Please Rate Overall the Technical Sessions that you attended Unacceptable Poor Fair/Adequate Good Excellent Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Unacceptable Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Poor Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Fair/Adequate Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Good Exterior Trim & Structural Applications Excellent Sustainability Sustainability Unacceptable Sustainability Poor Sustainability Fair/Adequate Sustainability Good Sustainability Excellent Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Unacceptable Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Poor Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Fair/Adequate Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Good Polyolefin Elastomers & Vulcanizates Excellent Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Unacceptable Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Poor Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Fair/Adequate Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Good Process Enabling & Additive Technologies Excellent Innovations in Interiors Innovations in Interiors Unacceptable Innovations in Interiors Poor Innovations in Interiors Fair/Adequate Innovations in Interiors Good Innovations in Interiors Excellent Material Development Material Development Unacceptable Material Development Poor Material Development Fair/Adequate Material Development Good Material Development Excellent Performance Additives & Colorants Performance Additives & Colorants Unacceptable Performance Additives & Colorants Poor Performance Additives & Colorants Fair/Adequate Performance Additives & Colorants Good Performance Additives & Colorants Excellent Question Title * 15. If you have any suggestions regarding how we could improve the existing Technical Sessions in the future, or if there are new sessions or topic areas you’d like to see, or different ways to present, please enter them in the box below. Question Title * 16. 1. Please rate the following aspects of the Conference Exhibition: Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area Unacceptable - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area Poor - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area Adequate - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area Good - Hotel Facility for the Exhibit Area Excellent - Placement of the Exhibitors - Placement of the Exhibitors Unacceptable - Placement of the Exhibitors Poor - Placement of the Exhibitors Adequate - Placement of the Exhibitors Good - Placement of the Exhibitors Excellent - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas Unacceptable - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas Poor - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas Adequate - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas Good - Ease of Movement in Exhibitor Areas Excellent - Number of Exhibitors - Number of Exhibitors Unacceptable - Number of Exhibitors Poor - Number of Exhibitors Adequate - Number of Exhibitors Good - Number of Exhibitors Excellent - Relevance of the Exhibitors - Relevance of the Exhibitors Unacceptable - Relevance of the Exhibitors Poor - Relevance of the Exhibitors Adequate - Relevance of the Exhibitors Good - Relevance of the Exhibitors Excellent - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas Unacceptable - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas Poor - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas Adequate - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas Good - Ability to Have a Discussion in Exhibit Areas Excellent Other (please specify) Question Title * 17. 1. Did the Networking Opportunities at the conference meet with your expectations? Did not Meet Expectation Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations Suggestions for Other Networking opportunities Question Title * 18. Are you planning on participating in this Conference in 2024? Yes No Question Title * 19. If you plan to attend in 2024, would you see value in continuing the hybrid event – containing a full live in-person and also virtual elements? Yes No Question Title * 20. If you have any suggestions regarding how we could improve the Conference in the future, please enter them in the box below. Done
