I support a regulatory approach to reducing risk. (Governments utilize a regulatory approach to adopt ordinances [rules] to restrict or direct certain activities. Aspects of a regulatory process include public review, requiring a developing or building permit, build-out inspections, and regulation enforcement.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support a non-regulatory approach to reducing risk. (A non-regulatory approach typically would consist of encouraging voluntary efforts to meet a certain performance standard.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support a mix of both regulatory and non-regulatory approaches to reducing risk. (This approach may feature flexible performance standards or utilize incentives as rewards if a minimum performance standard is met.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support policies to prohibit development in areas subject to flood hazards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support the use of tax dollars (federal and/or local) to compensate landowners for not developing in areas subject to flood hazards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support the use of local tax dollars to reduce risks and losses from the subject hazards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support protecting historical and cultural structures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am willing to make my home or places of business more resistant to the profile hazards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support development of a post-disaster recovery plan that contains guidance and prioritized actions to implement following as disaster event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I support maintaining a local inventory of at-risk building and infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|