Symposium Evaluation 2023: Affirming Care for Nonbinary Individuals 3-2023

Randall Leonard, LCSW-C

Expanding Gender Affirming Health Care Symposium 2023

Question Title

* 1. A complete evaluation is required in order to earn Continuing Education credit and or a Certificate of Completion for this session. Please enter your first and last name.

Question Title

* 2. How much time did you spend taking this session (hours and minutes)

Question Title

* 3. How well the instructor cover each of these Learning Objectives:?

	Excellent	Good	Neutral	Fair	Poor
Explore the historical context of multiple genders	Explore the historical context of multiple genders Excellent	Explore the historical context of multiple genders Good	Explore the historical context of multiple genders Neutral	Explore the historical context of multiple genders Fair	Explore the historical context of multiple genders Poor
Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities	Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities Excellent	Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities Good	Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities Neutral	Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities Fair	Be able to name at least 3 social experiences a non-binary person might face and how those differ depending on gender expression and other intersecting identities Poor
Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers	Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers Excellent	Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers Good	Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers Neutral	Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers Fair	Be able to identity at least 3 barriers to care for someone with a nonbinary identity and the requirement of ethical practice standards to reduce these barriers Poor

Comments:

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the overall quality of this session:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
This session was useful and relevant to my practice	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Strongly Agree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Agree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Neutral	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Disagree	This session was useful and relevant to my practice Strongly Disagree
This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Strongly Agree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Agree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Neutral	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Disagree	This session met my expectations as outlined in the promotional material Strongly Disagree
Content was current and well organized	Content was current and well organized Strongly Agree	Content was current and well organized Agree	Content was current and well organized Neutral	Content was current and well organized Disagree	Content was current and well organized Strongly Disagree
The instructional materials were suitable and useful	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Strongly Agree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Agree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Neutral	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Disagree	The instructional materials were suitable and useful Strongly Disagree
Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Strongly Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Neutral	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable, prepared, and effective Strongly Disagree
Questions and interaction were encouraged	Questions and interaction were encouraged Strongly Agree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Agree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Neutral	Questions and interaction were encouraged Disagree	Questions and interaction were encouraged Strongly Disagree
Course technology was user-friendly	Course technology was user-friendly Strongly Agree	Course technology was user-friendly Agree	Course technology was user-friendly Neutral	Course technology was user-friendly Disagree	Course technology was user-friendly Strongly Disagree
I would recommend this training to a colleague	I would recommend this training to a colleague Strongly Agree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Agree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Neutral	I would recommend this training to a colleague Disagree	I would recommend this training to a colleague Strongly Disagree

Comments:

Question Title

* 5. What did you enjoy most about this session?

Question Title

* 6. What would you change about this session?

Question Title

* 7. Additional comments about this session: