The Center for Medicare Advocacy's National Voices of Medicare Summit and Sen. Jay Rockefeller Lecture
1.
How many
National Voices of Medicare Summits
have you attended?
This was my first!
2
3
4
5 or more
2.
How many other Center for Medicare Advocacy virtual events or webinars have you attended?
This was my first!
2
3
4
5 or more
3.
How likely are you to attend another
National Voices of Medicare Summit
in the future?
Very likely
Likely
Neither likely nor unlikely
Unlikely
Very unlikely
4.
How likely are you to attend other Center for Medicare Advocacy's virtual events or webinars?
Very likely
Likely
Neither likely nor unlikely
Unlikely
Very unlikely
5.
Please rate the overall quality of the
Summit
.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
6.
Please rate the overall quality of Center for Medicare Advocacy Staff with whom you interacted, if applicable.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
7.
Please rate the overall quality of the video production.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
8.
Did the speaker(s) present the information in a way that was clear and useful to you?
Yes
Mostly
Not Consistently
No
9.
Did the
National Voices of Medicare Summit
meet your expectations overall?
Yes
Mostly
Not Consistently
No
10.
What did you think of the balance between presentations and questions?
I think the balance was good
I would prefer more time hearing from presenters
I would prefer more time for questions and discussions
11.
How did you hear about the
National Voices of Medicare Summit
?
12.
What topics would you like to see covered at a future
Summit
?
13.
Who would you like to see featured as a speaker at a future
Summit
?
14.
Do you have any additional feedback and/or suggestions to help us improve your experience with our future programs?
15.
For CLE respondents - Please provide your name.
16.
For CLE respondents - Please provide your organization and title.
17.
For CLE respondents - Please provide your email address.
18.
For CLE respondents - Did the
Summit
deal with matters directly related to the practice of law, law practice management, professional responsibility, or ethical obligations of lawyers?
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Deficient
19.
For CLE respondents - Were the
Summit
materials written and the lectures presented by individuals qualified by practical or academic experience in a setting physically suitable to the educational activity of the program?
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Deficient
20.
For CLE respondents - Were thorough, high quality, and carefully prepared written materials distributed to you at or before the time the
Summit
was presented?
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Deficient
21.
For CLE respondents - Overall the
Summit
was...
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Deficient
22.
For CLE respondents - Please provide any additional comments.
