CLOQUET FIELD TOUR 2018 EVALUATION Survey

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about this Field Tour?

LSFSC Newsletter or email

Social Media

Information passed on to you

other

Question Title

* 2. Was the overview presentation at the Cloquet Forestry Center helpful?

Yes

Question Title

* 3. Please evaluate the overall effectiveness of this Field Tour.

	1 = Not Effective	2	3	4	5 = Very Effective
Organization and preparation	Organization and preparation 1 = Not Effective	Organization and preparation 2	Organization and preparation 3	Organization and preparation 4	Organization and preparation 5 = Very Effective
Style and delivery	Style and delivery 1 = Not Effective	Style and delivery 2	Style and delivery 3	Style and delivery 4	Style and delivery 5 = Very Effective
Responsiveness to participants	Responsiveness to participants 1 = Not Effective	Responsiveness to participants 2	Responsiveness to participants 3	Responsiveness to participants 4	Responsiveness to participants 5 = Very Effective
Creating a learning environment	Creating a learning environment 1 = Not Effective	Creating a learning environment 2	Creating a learning environment 3	Creating a learning environment 4	Creating a learning environment 5 = Very Effective
Content of the Field Tour	Content of the Field Tour 1 = Not Effective	Content of the Field Tour 2	Content of the Field Tour 3	Content of the Field Tour 4	Content of the Field Tour 5 = Very Effective

Question Title

* 4. Please rate your knowledge of the following topics before and after attending the Field Tour using a 1-3 scale (1 = poor; 3 = excellent)

	BEFORE 1 = Poor	Attendiing 2	Workshop 3 = Excellent	AFTER 1 = Poor	Attendiing 2	Workshop 3 = Excellent
Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine)	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) BEFORE 1 = Poor	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) Attendiing 2	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) Workshop 3 = Excellent	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) AFTER 1 = Poor	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) Attendiing 2	Evaluating fire history/ fire regimes (CFC reserve stand of 1820s origin pine) Workshop 3 = Excellent
CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots)	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) BEFORE 1 = Poor	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) Attendiing 2	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) Workshop 3 = Excellent	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) AFTER 1 = Poor	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) Attendiing 2	CFC red pine understory treatment (burn, mechanical, herbicide) (Gilmore/D'Amato project plots) Workshop 3 = Excellent
FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management)	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) BEFORE 1 = Poor	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) Attendiing 2	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) Workshop 3 = Excellent	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) AFTER 1 = Poor	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) Attendiing 2	FDL Deadfish Lake - blueberry burns, and riparian management with fire (bonus discussion on FDL history and wild rice management) Workshop 3 = Excellent
FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations BEFORE 1 = Poor	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations Attendiing 2	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations Workshop 3 = Excellent	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations AFTER 1 = Poor	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations Attendiing 2	FDL white pine shelterwood - three past understory burns, temporal regeneration expectations Workshop 3 = Excellent
Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning BEFORE 1 = Poor	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning Attendiing 2	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning Workshop 3 = Excellent	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning AFTER 1 = Poor	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning Attendiing 2	Optional #5 site visit - CFC 1850s origin Rook sale + Firewise thinning Workshop 3 = Excellent

Question Title

* 5. How much did this field tour provide you or your organization with information to meet your Applied Science Information needs as a Land Manager (1= Very Little, 5=Very Much)?

	1 = Very Little	2	3	4	5 = Very Much
Applied Science Information needs met...	Applied Science Information needs met... 1 = Very Little	Applied Science Information needs met... 2	Applied Science Information needs met... 3	Applied Science Information needs met... 4	Applied Science Information needs met... 5 = Very Much

Question Title

* 6. Do you plan to make any changes or take any actions in your work based on this Field Tour?

Yes

Not Sure

If “Yes” could you briefly explain?

Question Title

* 7. If your answer to the question above was “No” or “Not sure,” which best describes why?

The information is interesting but cannot be directly applied in my work

Need more information or training

Other

If “Other” please explain briefly:

Question Title

* 8. Were there topics that were not covered or information you were hoping to get from this field tour? Are there other portions of CFC or FDL that you were hoping to see that we did not get to? Please briefly describe if you noticed a gap in information sharing.

Question Title

* 9. We are planning to hold future field tours: What content and topics, geography/ location, and audience would benefit the most from these future field tours?