Exit this survey Paris IC60 - FLACS: the state of the art – EBO Question Title * 1. Participant Name: Question Title * 2. Professional Situation: Resident Ophthalmologist Invited jury member Question Title * 3. Did you attend the full course? Yes No If not, why did you leave? Question Title * 4. What was your main reason for choosing this course? Preparation for the EBOD Content not available in my training centre Personal interest Question Title * 5. How useful would you rate this course? Very useful Useful Not useful Question Title * 6. Did all listed faculty members attend this course? Yes No Question Title * 7. Was this course free from bias? Yes No Question Title * 8. Do you have any suggestions to improve the didactic aspect of this course: Question Title * 9. Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course: Question Title * 10. Please list other courses you would like EBO to organise: Question Title * 11. How would you rate the presentation of each faculty member? Course content Quality of illustrations Presentation Expertise A. Marinho: Introduction Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: Introduction Course content menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: Introduction Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: Introduction Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: Introduction Expertise menu Z. Nagy: Present and Future of FLACS Very Good Good Poor Z. Nagy: Present and Future of FLACS Course content menu Very Good Good Poor Z. Nagy: Present and Future of FLACS Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor Z. Nagy: Present and Future of FLACS Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor Z. Nagy: Present and Future of FLACS Expertise menu A. Marinho: FLACS versus Phaco Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: FLACS versus Phaco Course content menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: FLACS versus Phaco Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: FLACS versus Phaco Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor A. Marinho: FLACS versus Phaco Expertise menu A. Vasavada: FLACS in routine cases Very Good Good Poor A. Vasavada: FLACS in routine cases Course content menu Very Good Good Poor A. Vasavada: FLACS in routine cases Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor A. Vasavada: FLACS in routine cases Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor A. Vasavada: FLACS in routine cases Expertise menu S. Vasavada: FLACS in difficult cases Very Good Good Poor S. Vasavada: FLACS in difficult cases Course content menu Very Good Good Poor S. Vasavada: FLACS in difficult cases Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor S. Vasavada: FLACS in difficult cases Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor S. Vasavada: FLACS in difficult cases Expertise menu G. Auffarth: IOLs for FLACS Very Good Good Poor G. Auffarth: IOLs for FLACS Course content menu Very Good Good Poor G. Auffarth: IOLs for FLACS Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor G. Auffarth: IOLs for FLACS Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor G. Auffarth: IOLs for FLACS Expertise menu R. Bellucci: Economic model of FLACS Very Good Good Poor R. Bellucci: Economic model of FLACS Course content menu Very Good Good Poor R. Bellucci: Economic model of FLACS Quality of illustrations menu Very Good Good Poor R. Bellucci: Economic model of FLACS Presentation menu Very Good Good Poor R. Bellucci: Economic model of FLACS Expertise menu Done