CREB®Maps survey

Question Title

* 1. Please identify if you are an:

Assistant

Associate

Broker

Appraiser

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the transition from GeoJet to CREB®Maps on a scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 being very dissatisfied and 5 being very satisfied):

1 (Very dissatisfied)

2 (Dissatisfied)

3 (Indifferent)

4 (Satisfied)

5 (Very satisfied)

1 (Very dissatisfied)

2 (Dissatisfied)

3 (Indifferent)

4 (Satisfied)

5 (Very satisfied)

Comments:

Question Title

* 3. How confident are you with using CREB®Maps as your new mapping tool?

Very confident. I'm having little to no problem.

Confident. I can perform all functions in CREB®Maps, but there're some tricks I could still learn.

Somewhat confident. I can perform basic functions and still have learning to do.

Not confident. I am not at all confident with using CREB®Maps.

Comments:

Question Title

* 4. Does CREB®Maps meet your needs?

Yes.

No.

Maybe, I'm still learning how to use it.

Neutral, I don't feel the tool offers better or worse functionality than the previous system.

Comments:

Question Title

* 5. What other information or features would you like CREB®Maps to offer? (Check all that apply and enter additional feedback in the comment box.)

More community census information (population, demographics etc.)

Further details on amenities (ex. off-leash dog parks, public pools)

Easement data

Ability to create my own community statistics

Additional reports and sharing options

Social media sharing capabilities

Heat maps

None, there's enough information on CREB®Maps for my needs.

Comments:

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the value of each learning resource for CREB®Maps:

	Did not use	Not valuable	Somewhat valuable	Valuable	Very valuable
CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link	CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link Did not use	CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link Not valuable	CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link Somewhat valuable	CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link Valuable	CREB®Maps Hub on CREB®Link Very valuable
CREB®Maps guide (PDF)	CREB®Maps guide (PDF) Did not use	CREB®Maps guide (PDF) Not valuable	CREB®Maps guide (PDF) Somewhat valuable	CREB®Maps guide (PDF) Valuable	CREB®Maps guide (PDF) Very valuable
CREB® Technology 360° course	CREB® Technology 360° course Did not use	CREB® Technology 360° course Not valuable	CREB® Technology 360° course Somewhat valuable	CREB® Technology 360° course Valuable	CREB® Technology 360° course Very valuable
Videos	Videos Did not use	Videos Not valuable	Videos Somewhat valuable	Videos Valuable	Videos Very valuable

Comments:

Question Title

* 7. CREB® members were involved in the development of CREB®Maps through the member-comprised Technology Standing Committee, focus groups and beta-testing. Did you feel there was enough member engagement in the decision to transition to CREB®Maps?

Yes

Indifferent

Comments:

Question Title

* 8. How well do you feel CREB® communicated about the transition to CREB®Maps on a scale from 1 to 5?
(A rating of 1 indicates you did not feel you were made adequately aware of the transition. A rating of 5 indicates you felt well aware of the transition and were notified of important updates.)

1 (I was unaware and caught off gaurd)

2 (I saw a few notifications, but there should have been more communications)

3 (Indifferent, I ignored communications)

4 (Aware)

5 (Well aware, there were a lot of notifications)

1 (I was unaware and caught off gaurd)

2 (I saw a few notifications, but there should have been more communications)

3 (Indifferent, I ignored communications)

4 (Aware)

5 (Well aware, there were a lot of notifications)

Comments:

Question Title

* 9. What, specifically, can CREB® provide more of to support members in future software launches? (Choose all that apply):

More time to adapt to changes

More feedback opportunities

More email notifications

More online presence (i.e. creblink.com, creb.com, brokers' bulletin, CREB®Talk blog posts, message-of-the-day notifications on the MLS® System etc.)

Question Title

* 10. How much lead-time do you feel is optimal to prepare members for similar software launches?

1 month

2 months

3 months

4 months

5 or more months

Not required

Comments:

Question Title

* 1. Please identify if you are an:

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the transition from GeoJet to CREB®Maps on a scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 being very dissatisfied and 5 being very satisfied):

Question Title

* 3. How confident are you with using CREB®Maps as your new mapping tool?

Question Title

* 4. Does CREB®Maps meet your needs?

Question Title

* 5. What other information or features would you like CREB®Maps to offer? (Check all that apply and enter additional feedback in the comment box.)

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the value of each learning resource for CREB®Maps:

Question Title

* 7. CREB® members were involved in the development of CREB®Maps through the member-comprised Technology Standing Committee, focus groups and beta-testing. Did you feel there was enough member engagement in the decision to transition to CREB®Maps?

Question Title

* 8. How well do you feel CREB® communicated about the transition to CREB®Maps on a scale from 1 to 5? (A rating of 1 indicates you did not feel you were made adequately aware of the transition. A rating of 5 indicates you felt well aware of the transition and were notified of important updates.)

Question Title

* 9. What, specifically, can CREB® provide more of to support members in future software launches? (Choose all that apply):

Question Title

* 10. How much lead-time do you feel is optimal to prepare members for similar software launches?

Question Title

* 11. Please provide any additional feedback or comments you may have on CREB®Maps.

* 8. How well do you feel CREB® communicated about the transition to CREB®Maps on a scale from 1 to 5?
(A rating of 1 indicates you did not feel you were made adequately aware of the transition. A rating of 5 indicates you felt well aware of the transition and were notified of important updates.)