AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation

The Keys to Couple Sexuality with Aging: Female-male Sexual Equity and Good Enough Sex (#185)
Presenter: Barry McCarthy, PhD
Sunday, June 16, 2019; 1 CE

We appreciate your help in evaluating this session. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high).

Question Title

* 1. OBJECTIVES
This session met the stated objectives of:

	Strongly disagree 1	Disagree 2	Neither agree or disagree 3	Agree 4	Strongly agree 5
identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging;	identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging; Strongly disagree 1	identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging; Disagree 2	identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging; Neither agree or disagree 3	identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging; Agree 4	identify psychological, bio-medical, and social/relational factors which promote and which subvert sexuality with aging; Strongly agree 5
critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex.	critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex. Strongly disagree 1	critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex. Disagree 2	critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex. Neither agree or disagree 3	critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex. Agree 4	critique the traditional double standard and pass-fail sex performance model and replace those with female-male equity and Good Enough Sex. Strongly agree 5

Question Title

* 2. Speaker(s)

	1	2	3	4	5
Knowledgeable in content areas	Knowledgeable in content areas 1	Knowledgeable in content areas 2	Knowledgeable in content areas 3	Knowledgeable in content areas 4	Knowledgeable in content areas 5
Content consistent with objectives	Content consistent with objectives 1	Content consistent with objectives 2	Content consistent with objectives 3	Content consistent with objectives 4	Content consistent with objectives 5
Clarified content in response to questions	Clarified content in response to questions 1	Clarified content in response to questions 2	Clarified content in response to questions 3	Clarified content in response to questions 4	Clarified content in response to questions 5

Question Title

* 3. Content

	Strongly disagree 1	Disagree 2	Neither agree or disagree 3	Agree 4	Strongly agree 5
Appropriate for intended audience	Appropriate for intended audience Strongly disagree 1	Appropriate for intended audience Disagree 2	Appropriate for intended audience Neither agree or disagree 3	Appropriate for intended audience Agree 4	Appropriate for intended audience Strongly agree 5
Consistent with stated objectives	Consistent with stated objectives Strongly disagree 1	Consistent with stated objectives Disagree 2	Consistent with stated objectives Neither agree or disagree 3	Consistent with stated objectives Agree 4	Consistent with stated objectives Strongly agree 5

Question Title

* 4. Teaching Methods

	1	2	3	4	5
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content	Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 1	Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 2	Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 3	Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 4	Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 5
Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter	Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 1	Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 2	Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 3	Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 4	Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 5

Question Title

* 5. Relevancy

	1	2	3	4	5
Information could be applied to practice	Information could be applied to practice 1	Information could be applied to practice 2	Information could be applied to practice 3	Information could be applied to practice 4	Information could be applied to practice 5
Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal	Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 1	Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 2	Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 3	Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 4	Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 5

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Very Little - 1

Great Deal - 5

Very Little - 1

Great Deal - 5

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Not Useful - 1

Extremely Useful - 5

Not Useful - 1

Extremely Useful - 5

Question Title

* 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.

Substantially

Somewhat

Not at All

Question Title

* 9. I would recommend this workshop to others.

Yes

Not Sure

AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation - #185

Concurrent Session

Question Title

* 1. OBJECTIVES
This session met the stated objectives of:

Question Title

* 2. Speaker(s)

Question Title

* 3. Content

Question Title

* 4. Teaching Methods

Question Title

* 5. Relevancy

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Question Title

* 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.

Question Title

* 9. I would recommend this workshop to others.

Question Title

* 1. OBJECTIVES This session met the stated objectives of:

Question Title

* 2. Speaker(s)

Question Title

* 3. Content

Question Title

* 4. Teaching Methods

Question Title

* 5. Relevancy

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Question Title

* 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.

Question Title

* 9. I would recommend this workshop to others.

* 1. OBJECTIVES
This session met the stated objectives of: