Exit this survey

Concurrent Session

Standards for Advertising, Promoting, and Publicizing AASECT Membership: Ethical Dilemmas and Controversies (#180)
Presenter: Daniel Watter, EdD, DST, CSTS
Sunday, June 16, 2019; 1.5 CE
We appreciate your help in evaluating this session. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high).

Question Title

* 1. OBJECTIVES
This session met the stated objectives of:

  Strongly disagree
1 		Disagree
2 		Neither agree or disagree
3 		Agree
4 		Strongly agree
5
apply the suggested guidelines for ethical advertising/promotion/publicizing of AASECT membership status; 
distinguish between the language that is integrity promoting, as opposed to potentially misleading in the preparation of advertising/promotion/publicizing of AASECT membership status and professional credentials.

Question Title

* 2. Speaker(s)

  1 2 3 4 5
Knowledgeable in content areas
Content consistent with objectives
Clarified content in response to questions

Question Title

* 3. Content

  Strongly disagree
1 		Disagree
2 		Neither agree or disagree
3 		Agree
4 		Strongly agree
5
Appropriate for intended audience
Consistent with stated objectives

Question Title

* 4. Teaching Methods

  1 2 3 4 5
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content
Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter

Question Title

* 5. Relevancy

  1 2 3 4 5
Information could be applied to practice
Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Question Title

* 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise.

Question Title

* 9. I would recommend this workshop to others.

T