Exit this survey AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation - #145 Schiller Plenary Trans, Just for the Fun of It: The Compassionate Practice of Gender in Four Dimensions (#145)Presenter: Kate BornsteinSaturday, June 15, 2019; 1 CE We appreciate your help in evaluating this session. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high). Question Title * 1. OBJECTIVES This session met the stated objectives of: Strongly disagree1 Disagree2 Neither agree or disagree3 Agree4 Strongly agree5 investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; Strongly disagree1 investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; Disagree2 investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; Neither agree or disagree3 investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; Agree4 investigate the value of analyzing gender in four dimensions; Strongly agree5 apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; Strongly disagree1 apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; Disagree2 apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; Neither agree or disagree3 apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; Agree4 apply the definitive truth of gender to resolve gender-based conflicts; Strongly agree5 propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. Strongly disagree1 propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. Disagree2 propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. Neither agree or disagree3 propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. Agree4 propose compassionate strategies of gender in divisive situations. Strongly agree5 Question Title * 2. Speaker(s) 1 2 3 4 5 Knowledgeable in content areas Knowledgeable in content areas 1 Knowledgeable in content areas 2 Knowledgeable in content areas 3 Knowledgeable in content areas 4 Knowledgeable in content areas 5 Content consistent with objectives Content consistent with objectives 1 Content consistent with objectives 2 Content consistent with objectives 3 Content consistent with objectives 4 Content consistent with objectives 5 Clarified content in response to questions Clarified content in response to questions 1 Clarified content in response to questions 2 Clarified content in response to questions 3 Clarified content in response to questions 4 Clarified content in response to questions 5 Question Title * 3. Content Strongly disagree1 Disagree2 Neither agree or disagree3 Agree4 Strongly agree5 Appropriate for intended audience Appropriate for intended audience Strongly disagree1 Appropriate for intended audience Disagree2 Appropriate for intended audience Neither agree or disagree3 Appropriate for intended audience Agree4 Appropriate for intended audience Strongly agree5 Consistent with stated objectives Consistent with stated objectives Strongly disagree1 Consistent with stated objectives Disagree2 Consistent with stated objectives Neither agree or disagree3 Consistent with stated objectives Agree4 Consistent with stated objectives Strongly agree5 Question Title * 4. Teaching Methods 1 2 3 4 5 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 1 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 2 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 3 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 4 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 5 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 1 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 2 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 3 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 4 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 5 Question Title * 5. Relevancy 1 2 3 4 5 Information could be applied to practice Information could be applied to practice 1 Information could be applied to practice 2 Information could be applied to practice 3 Information could be applied to practice 4 Information could be applied to practice 5 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 1 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 2 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 3 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 4 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 5 Question Title * 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? Very Little - 1 2 3 4 Great Deal - 5 Very Little - 1 2 3 4 Great Deal - 5 Question Title * 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? Not Useful - 1 2 3 4 Extremely Useful - 5 Not Useful - 1 2 3 4 Extremely Useful - 5 Question Title * 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise. Substantially Somewhat Not at All Question Title * 9. I would recommend this workshop to others. Yes No Not Sure Done
