Exit this survey AASECT 2019 Annual Conference Evaluation - #137 Concurrent Session Sex Esteem® Positive Embodiment Exercises and Experiential Sculpting for Increased Physical and EmotionalConnection in Systemic Couples Sex Therapy (#137)Presenter: Sari Eckler Cooper, LCSW-R, CST, CSTSFriday, June 14, 2019; 1.5 CE We appreciate your help in evaluating this session. Please indicate your rating of the presentation in the categories below by selecting the appropriate number, using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high). Question Title * 1. OBJECTIVES This session met the stated objectives of: Strongly disagree1 Disagree2 Neither agree or disagree3 Agree4 Strongly agree5 recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; Strongly disagree1 recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; Disagree2 recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; Neither agree or disagree3 recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; Agree4 recognize which cases could benefit from experiential exercises; demonstrate these exercises for clients; Strongly agree5 compose a sculpting scene in a session; compose a sculpting scene in a session; Strongly disagree1 compose a sculpting scene in a session; Disagree2 compose a sculpting scene in a session; Neither agree or disagree3 compose a sculpting scene in a session; Agree4 compose a sculpting scene in a session; Strongly agree5 evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. Strongly disagree1 evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. Disagree2 evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. Neither agree or disagree3 evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. Agree4 evaluate the lessons unearthed with the couples. Strongly agree5 Question Title * 2. Speaker(s) 1 2 3 4 5 Knowledgeable in content areas Knowledgeable in content areas 1 Knowledgeable in content areas 2 Knowledgeable in content areas 3 Knowledgeable in content areas 4 Knowledgeable in content areas 5 Content consistent with objectives Content consistent with objectives 1 Content consistent with objectives 2 Content consistent with objectives 3 Content consistent with objectives 4 Content consistent with objectives 5 Clarified content in response to questions Clarified content in response to questions 1 Clarified content in response to questions 2 Clarified content in response to questions 3 Clarified content in response to questions 4 Clarified content in response to questions 5 Question Title * 3. Content Strongly disagree1 Disagree2 Neither agree or disagree3 Agree4 Strongly agree5 Appropriate for intended audience Appropriate for intended audience Strongly disagree1 Appropriate for intended audience Disagree2 Appropriate for intended audience Neither agree or disagree3 Appropriate for intended audience Agree4 Appropriate for intended audience Strongly agree5 Consistent with stated objectives Consistent with stated objectives Strongly disagree1 Consistent with stated objectives Disagree2 Consistent with stated objectives Neither agree or disagree3 Consistent with stated objectives Agree4 Consistent with stated objectives Strongly agree5 Question Title * 4. Teaching Methods 1 2 3 4 5 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 1 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 2 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 3 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 4 Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 5 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 1 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 2 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 3 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 4 Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter 5 Question Title * 5. Relevancy 1 2 3 4 5 Information could be applied to practice Information could be applied to practice 1 Information could be applied to practice 2 Information could be applied to practice 3 Information could be applied to practice 4 Information could be applied to practice 5 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 1 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 2 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 3 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 4 Information could contribute to achieving personal, professional goal 5 Question Title * 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? Very Little - 1 2 3 4 Great Deal - 5 Very Little - 1 2 3 4 Great Deal - 5 Question Title * 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? Not Useful - 1 2 3 4 Extremely Useful - 5 Not Useful - 1 2 3 4 Extremely Useful - 5 Question Title * 8. This workshop enhanced my professional expertise. Substantially Somewhat Not at All Question Title * 9. I would recommend this workshop to others. Yes No Not Sure Done