Speaker Survey Shaina Archer, Vincent Lee Question Title * 1. The session met the stated learning objectives 1 Learning objective not met 2 3 Learning objective partially met 4 5 Learning objective met Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression 1 Learning objective not met Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression 2 Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression 3 Learning objective partially met Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression 4 Learning Objective 1: Understand the rationale for maintenance intranasal ketamine for treatment resistant depression 5 Learning objective met Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine 1 Learning objective not met Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine 2 Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine 3 Learning objective partially met Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine 4 Learning Objective 2: Report on the clinical response and tolerability of maintenance intranasal ketamine 5 Learning objective met OK Question Title * 2. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant this presentation is to you. By relevance, we mean how appropriate the topic and effective the speaker is for you. 1-Not at all relevant 2 3 4 5-Extremely relevant 1-Not at all relevant 2 3 4 5-Extremely relevant Additional comments: OK Question Title * 3. On a scale from 1 (no opportunity) to 5 (outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction), please rate how interactive this presentation was for you. By interaction we mean discussion, questions and engagement with the presenter and the topic. 1- No opportunity 2 3 4 5-Outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction 1- No opportunity 2 3 4 5-Outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction Additional Comments: OK Question Title * 4. Please provide us with any additional comments or observations you would like us to be aware of. OK DONE