Speaker Survey

Question Title

* 1. The session met the stated learning objectives

	1 Learning objective not met	2	3 Learning objective partially met	4	5 Learning objective met
Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care	Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care 1 Learning objective not met	Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care 2	Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care 3 Learning objective partially met	Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care 4	Learning Objective 1: To review evidence for standardized orders in routine hospital care 5 Learning objective met
Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study	Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study 1 Learning objective not met	Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study 2	Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study 3 Learning objective partially met	Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study 4	Learning Objective 2:To appreciate factors pertaining to psychiatrists, residents, and allied staff affecting the design and use of standardized orders, as demonstrated in this quality improvement case study 5 Learning objective met

Question Title

* 2. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant this presentation is to you. By relevance, we mean how appropriate the topic and effective the speaker is for you.

1-Not at all relevant

5-Extremely relevant

1-Not at all relevant

5-Extremely relevant

Additional comments:

Question Title

* 3. On a scale from 1 (no opportunity) to 5 (outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction), please rate how interactive this presentation was for you. By interaction we mean discussion, questions and engagement with the presenter and the topic.

1- No opportunity

5-Outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction

1- No opportunity

5-Outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction

Additional Comments:

Speaker Survey

Dr. Alex Dyck

Question Title

* 1. The session met the stated learning objectives

Question Title

* 2. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant this presentation is to you. By relevance, we mean how appropriate the topic and effective the speaker is for you.

Question Title

* 3. On a scale from 1 (no opportunity) to 5 (outstanding opportunity for discussion and interaction), please rate how interactive this presentation was for you. By interaction we mean discussion, questions and engagement with the presenter and the topic.

Question Title

* 4. Please provide us with any additional comments or observations you would like us to be aware of.