Nominate the Best Reviewer for the EURAM 2025 Conference

Question Title

* 1. Author's First Name

Question Title

* 2. Author's Last Name (Family Name)

Question Title

* 3. Title of the paper submitted to EURAM 2025

Question Title

* 4. Paper ID

Question Title

* 5. Does the reviewer elaborate constructive comments?

  5- Outstanding 4 - Good 3 - Fair 2 - Poor 1 - Very Poor
Enter your rating:

Question Title

* 6. Does the reviewer identify the paper’s weakness?

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Good 3 - Fair 2 - Poor 1 - Very Poor
Enter a rating

Question Title

* 7. Does the reviewer provide theoretical suggestions in order to enrich the paper’s theoretical framework and/or to overcome the paper’s weakness?

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Good 3 - Fair 2 - Poor 1 - Very Poor
Enter your rating:

Question Title

* 8. When login in to XCD, which of the reviewers would you like to nominate as Best Reviewer?

Question Title

* 9. Optional question:
Please enter any other suggestions/comments you might have here: