20170916 - 0900-1000 Recognizing the Unrecognizable Survey

Recognizing the Unrecognizable : At the Gross Bench

Speaker: Jasim Radhi

At the end of the session, delegates will be able to:
Recognize the unrecognizable , or at least include them in your differential
Identify the features that can aid in the correct interpretation
Differentiate between malignant and benign

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree
The facilities were satisfactory	The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree	The facilities were satisfactory Disagree	The facilities were satisfactory Neutral	The facilities were satisfactory Agree	The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree
The session was free from commercial bias	The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias Neutral	The session was free from commercial bias Agree	The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree
Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree

Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree

The facilities were satisfactory

The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree

The facilities were satisfactory Disagree

The facilities were satisfactory Neutral

The facilities were satisfactory Agree

The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree

The session was free from commercial bias

The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree

The session was free from commercial bias Disagree

The session was free from commercial bias Neutral

The session was free from commercial bias Agree

The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree

Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Outstanding
Clarity of Voice	Clarity of Voice Poor	Clarity of Voice Fair	Clarity of Voice Good	Clarity of Voice Very Good	Clarity of Voice Outstanding
Met Stated Objectives	Met Stated Objectives Poor	Met Stated Objectives Fair	Met Stated Objectives Good	Met Stated Objectives Very Good	Met Stated Objectives Outstanding
Balanced & Unbiased	Balanced & Unbiased Poor	Balanced & Unbiased Fair	Balanced & Unbiased Good	Balanced & Unbiased Very Good	Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding
Relevant to Practice Overall	Relevant to Practice Overall Poor	Relevant to Practice Overall Fair	Relevant to Practice Overall Good	Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good	Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding
Time for Active Learning	Time for Active Learning Poor	Time for Active Learning Fair	Time for Active Learning Good	Time for Active Learning Very Good	Time for Active Learning Outstanding

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Outstanding

Clarity of Voice

Clarity of Voice Poor

Clarity of Voice Fair

Clarity of Voice Good

Clarity of Voice Very Good

Clarity of Voice Outstanding

Met Stated Objectives

Met Stated Objectives Poor

Met Stated Objectives Fair

Met Stated Objectives Good

Met Stated Objectives Very Good

Met Stated Objectives Outstanding

Balanced & Unbiased

Balanced & Unbiased Poor

Balanced & Unbiased Fair

Balanced & Unbiased Good

Balanced & Unbiased Very Good

Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding

Relevant to Practice Overall

Relevant to Practice Overall Poor

Relevant to Practice Overall Fair

Relevant to Practice Overall Good

Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good

Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding

Time for Active Learning

Time for Active Learning Poor

Time for Active Learning Fair

Time for Active Learning Good

Time for Active Learning Very Good

Time for Active Learning Outstanding

20170916 - 0900-1000 Recognizing the Unrecognizable

Saturday, September 16

Question Title

* 1. Please assess the Session

Question Title

* 2. Please assess the Speaker

Question Title

* 3. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to:

Question Title

* 4. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session:

Question Title

* 5. General comments about individual speaker:

Question Title

* 6. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession?