Virtual Plenary 17 Participant Survey

Question Title

* 1. Name

Question Title

* 2. Organisation

Question Title

* 3. Country

Question Title

* 4. Occupation

Advisor/Consultant

Professor

Researcher

Librarian

Student

CEO/Managing Director/Chief Executive

CTO/IT Director

Programme Manager/Project Manager

Policy development manager/Policy Consultant

IT Specialist/IT Architect

Journalist/Editor/Copywriter

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 5. How many plenaries have you attended so far?

2-4

5-7

8-10

More than 10

This is my first Plenary

Question Title

* 6. Which sessions did you attend at RDA VP17?

Plenary sessions

Breakout sessions

Poster hall and sessions

Social events

Networking sessions

RDA/IDCC Unconference

None of the above

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the content and format of the following program components?

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent	Did not attend
Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Poor	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Fair	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Good	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Very Good	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Excellent	Day 1 - "Research Data in the Wider Data Ecosystem", Dr Jeni Tennison, the Open Data Institute Did not attend
Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Poor	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Fair	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Good	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Very Good	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Excellent	Day 1 - Joint IDCC/RDA Unconference Did not attend
Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Poor	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Fair	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Good	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Very Good	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Excellent	Day 2 - Outputs and Adoption Session Did not attend
Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Poor	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Fair	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Good	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Very Good	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Excellent	Day 2 - Panel Session: Facilitating Greater Data Reuse: Lessons and Examples from Practice Did not attend
Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Poor	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Fair	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Good	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Very Good	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Excellent	Day 3 - Plenary Session:"Building a Robust FAIR Biomedical Data Ecosystem". Dr Susan K. Gregurick, National Institutes of Health Did not attend
Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Poor	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Fair	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Good	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Very Good	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Excellent	Day 3 - "Open Science and Drug Discovery: Removing Barriers to Accelerate Research". Professor Richard Gold, McGill University, Centre for Intellectual Property Did not attend
All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith"	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Poor	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Fair	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Good	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Very Good	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Excellent	All days - Social Sessions ("Whit is Scots? An Introduction", Ceilidh Lessons, "RDA meets Edinburgh Fringe - Stuart Goldsmith" Did not attend
All days - Networking sessions	All days - Networking sessions Poor	All days - Networking sessions Fair	All days - Networking sessions Good	All days - Networking sessions Very Good	All days - Networking sessions Excellent	All days - Networking sessions Did not attend
Poster hall and sessions	Poster hall and sessions Poor	Poster hall and sessions Fair	Poster hall and sessions Good	Poster hall and sessions Very Good	Poster hall and sessions Excellent	Poster hall and sessions Did not attend

Question Title

* 8. How satisfied were you with the following communications used in the promotion of the event:

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent	Did not attend
Email campaigns from Organizing Committee	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Poor	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Fair	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Good	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Very Good	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Excellent	Email campaigns from Organizing Committee Did not attend
RDA website postings	RDA website postings Poor	RDA website postings Fair	RDA website postings Good	RDA website postings Very Good	RDA website postings Excellent	RDA website postings Did not attend
Plenary Pathways	Plenary Pathways Poor	Plenary Pathways Fair	Plenary Pathways Good	Plenary Pathways Very Good	Plenary Pathways Excellent	Plenary Pathways Did not attend
Social media	Social media Poor	Social media Fair	Social media Good	Social media Very Good	Social media Excellent	Social media Did not attend
Webinars	Webinars Poor	Webinars Fair	Webinars Good	Webinars Very Good	Webinars Excellent	Webinars Did not attend
Other	Other Poor	Other Fair	Other Good	Other Very Good	Other Excellent	Other Did not attend

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the technology event platform (JunoLive) overall?

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the following aspects of the plenary meeting technology platform?

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent	Did not attend
Usability of the overall site	Usability of the overall site Poor	Usability of the overall site Fair	Usability of the overall site Good	Usability of the overall site Very Good	Usability of the overall site Excellent	Usability of the overall site Did not attend
Navigation	Navigation Poor	Navigation Fair	Navigation Good	Navigation Very Good	Navigation Excellent	Navigation Did not attend
Schedule layout	Schedule layout Poor	Schedule layout Fair	Schedule layout Good	Schedule layout Very Good	Schedule layout Excellent	Schedule layout Did not attend
Support availability	Support availability Poor	Support availability Fair	Support availability Good	Support availability Very Good	Support availability Excellent	Support availability Did not attend
Accessibility	Accessibility Poor	Accessibility Fair	Accessibility Good	Accessibility Very Good	Accessibility Excellent	Accessibility Did not attend
Ability to see and interact with other attendees	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Poor	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Fair	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Good	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Very Good	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Excellent	Ability to see and interact with other attendees Did not attend
Breakout meeting functionality	Breakout meeting functionality Poor	Breakout meeting functionality Fair	Breakout meeting functionality Good	Breakout meeting functionality Very Good	Breakout meeting functionality Excellent	Breakout meeting functionality Did not attend
Poster area layout	Poster area layout Poor	Poster area layout Fair	Poster area layout Good	Poster area layout Very Good	Poster area layout Excellent	Poster area layout Did not attend

Question Title

* 11. Please provide any comments you have about the event platform used for VP17 (JunoLive)?

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the registration process?

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your feedback on the registration fee.

It was appropriate for the event

It was too expensive

It was too cheap

Other (please specify)

Virtual Plenary 17 Participant Survey

Question Title

* 1. Name

Question Title

* 2. Organisation

Question Title

* 3. Country

Question Title

* 4. Occupation

Question Title

* 5. How many plenaries have you attended so far?

Question Title

* 6. Which sessions did you attend at RDA VP17?

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the content and format of the following program components?

Question Title

* 8. How satisfied were you with the following communications used in the promotion of the event:

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the technology event platform (JunoLive) overall?

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the following aspects of the plenary meeting technology platform?

Question Title

* 11. Please provide any comments you have about the event platform used for VP17 (JunoLive)?

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the registration process?

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your feedback on the registration fee.

Question Title

* 14. Please provide any other feedback, ideas or suggestions for future virtual, physical and hybrid RDA Plenary meetings.

Question Title

* 15. What is the main benefit of attending the RDA plenaries for you?

Question Title

* 16. Do you have any other comments about RDA VP17?

Question Title

* 17. Are there any specific topics, areas or session formats you would like to see covered in future plenaries?