Plenary: Imaging with Impact in Suspected Ovarian Cancer (A. Rockall)

Working Together: Radiology at the Heart of Care

SAT, APRIL 5, 2025
9:00 - 10:00 AM

Plenary: Imaging with Impact in Suspected Ovarian Cancer

Speaker: Andrea Rockall

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

At the end of the presentation, delegates will be able to:

Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses.
Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer.
Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics.

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate how well the learning objectives were met. After attending the Plenary Imaging with Impact in Suspected Ovarian Cancer, I am able to:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses.	Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses. Strongly Disagree	Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses. Disagree	Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses. Agree	Describe the ORADS-MRI scoring system and its application in the risk stratification of adnexal masses. Strongly Agree
Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer.	Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer. Strongly Disagree	Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer. Disagree	Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer. Agree	Identify critical sites of disease on CT and MRI that impact treatment planning for ovarian cancer. Strongly Agree
Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics.	Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics. Strongly Disagree	Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics. Disagree	Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics. Agree	Discuss emerging research developments that may improve risk stratification methods in the future, including the application of radiomics. Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which CanMEDS you felt were effectively addressed during the presentation.

Collaborator

Communicator

Health Advocate

Leader

Medical Expert

Professional

Scholar

Question Title

* 3. Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives.	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Strongly Disagree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Disagree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Agree	The lecture content was clear, precise, and aligned with the learning objectives. Strongly Agree
The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging.	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Strongly Disagree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Disagree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Agree	The speaker was knowledgeable and engaging. Strongly Agree
The information was relevant to my practice.	The information was relevant to my practice. Strongly Disagree	The information was relevant to my practice. Disagree	The information was relevant to my practice. Agree	The information was relevant to my practice. Strongly Agree
The amount of material covered was appropriate.	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Strongly Disagree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Disagree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Agree	The amount of material covered was appropriate. Strongly Agree
There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content.	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Strongly Disagree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Disagree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Agree	There was sufficient opportunity for discussion and questions within the educational content. Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 4. Did you perceive any commercial or industry bias?

Yes

Plenary: Imaging with Impact in Suspected Ovarian Cancer (A. Rockall)

Working Together: Radiology at the Heart of Care

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate how well the learning objectives were met. After attending the Plenary Imaging with Impact in Suspected Ovarian Cancer, I am able to:

Question Title

* 2. Please indicate which CanMEDS you felt were effectively addressed during the presentation.

Question Title

* 3. Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements

Question Title

* 4. Did you perceive any commercial or industry bias?

Question Title

* 5. If yes, please comment

Question Title

* 6. Please list any practice changes you will make after attending this lecture.

Question Title

* 7. What would you like to learn more about?

Question Title

* 8. What do you wish your colleagues knew about this topic?