Exit this survey Lecture Evaluation 3% of survey complete. Question Title * 1. Which lecture are you evaluating? ACOs: Where to Begin? ASCO-CAP Guidelines for Breast Predictive Factor Testing Bacterial Identification by Mass Spectrometry Clinical Laboratory Automation: Evaluating and Selecting an Automation System Diabetes Mellitus & Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis of Monoclonal Gammopathies Drug Testing to Support Pain Management Clinics Epidemic of Vitamin D Deficiency and Health Hazards Fetal Lung Maturity Testing: Current Challenges and Considerations From Mad Hatters to Thimerosal: The Truth about Mercury Poisoning Genetics of Familial Colorectal Cancer Syndromes Genomic Hybridization Harmful Effects of Stored RBC Transfusion: Bench to Bedside Hemoglobinopathies: Clinical and Hematologic Features and Molecular Basis Hepatitis B Drug Resistance: Navigating the Way Forward How to Write a Scientific Paper Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Lab Strategies in an Era of Health Care Reform Legislative & Regulatory Issues Facing Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Maternal Metabolic Disorders Identified Through Newborn Screening Medicaid Program Changes: Addressing Concerns for the Clinical Laboratory Neural Tube Defects Optimizing Warfarin Dose Other Prion Disease History and Transmission in a Medical Setting Procalcitonin Rapid-Cycle PCR Testing a Test: Beyond Sensitivity and Specificity The Shifting Regulatory Sands for Clinical Laboratories Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. What is your position? This helps us know what segment of the medical field enjoys or dislikes this lecture: Medical Technical (MT: Lab or medical personnel) Non-Medical Technical (NMT: Support/Office area personnel) Supervisor/Manager (MT) Supervisor/Manager (NMT) If you'd rather be specific, please specify: Question Title * 3. To what extent was the speaker knowledgeable, organized, and effective during the presentation? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Speaker Rating: Speaker Rating: 1 = Poor Speaker Rating: 2 = Fair Speaker Rating: 3 = Good Speaker Rating: 4 = Excellent Speaker Rating: N/A Question Title * 4. To what extent did the speaker clarify and focus on the stated objectives? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Speaker Rating: Speaker Rating: 1 = Poor Speaker Rating: 2 = Fair Speaker Rating: 3 = Good Speaker Rating: 4 = Excellent Speaker Rating: N/A Question Title * 5. To what extent were the speaker's teaching methods and aids appropriate and effective? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Speaker Rating: Speaker Rating: 1 = Poor Speaker Rating: 2 = Fair Speaker Rating: 3 = Good Speaker Rating: 4 = Excellent Speaker Rating: N/A Question Title * 6. To what extent were the teaching methods and aids appropriately and effectively used? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Speaker Rating: Speaker Rating: 1 = Poor Speaker Rating: 2 = Fair Speaker Rating: 3 = Good Speaker Rating: 4 = Excellent Speaker Rating: N/A If less than 4 marked for any of the speaker ratings, why? Question Title * 7. To what extent did the program content relate to the program's objectives? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Content Rating: Content Rating: 1 = Poor Content Rating: 2 = Fair Content Rating: 3 = Good Content Rating: 4 = Excellent Content Rating: N/A Question Title * 8. Rate the contribution of this session to your overall knowledge of this subject? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Content Rating: Content Rating: 1 = Poor Content Rating: 2 = Fair Content Rating: 3 = Good Content Rating: 4 = Excellent Content Rating: N/A Question Title * 9. Rate your overall degree of satisfaction with this session? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Content Rating: Content Rating: 1 = Poor Content Rating: 2 = Fair Content Rating: 3 = Good Content Rating: 4 = Excellent Content Rating: N/A Question Title * 10. Rate your level of expertise in this subject prior to this session? 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent N/A Content Rating: Content Rating: 1 = Poor Content Rating: 2 = Fair Content Rating: 3 = Good Content Rating: 4 = Excellent Content Rating: N/A If less than 4 marked for any of the content ratings, why? Next
