Question Title

* 1. Category of respondent:

Question Title

* 2. Name of the organization (OPTIONAL)

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) PGEU contribution to the EU policy making?

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) PGEU contribution to the public conferences, roundtable, working groups?

Question Title

* 5. To what extent do you consider PGEU as a constructive partner in EU health debates (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating a non-constructive partner – 10 indicating a very constructive partner)?

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) PGEU relationship with your organisation?

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) the quality of PGEU Position Papers?

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) the quality of PGEU Press Releases?

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) the quality of PGEU website?

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate (from 1 to 10, 1 indicating very poor – 10 indicating excellent) PGEU engagement in social media?

Question Title

* 11. What are in your view the main challenges for community pharmacists in the next 5 years?

Question Title

* 12. What are in your view the major contributions that community pharmacists can bring to EU Health Systems in the next 5 years?

Question Title

* 13. Is there any future priority of your organization on which you would consider PGEU as a partner?

Question Title

* 14. Is there any additional comment or suggestion you want to make?

T