Urban Workstream Survey

1.Leadership: Decision-making was consistent, well communicated and done in consultation with the relevant parties.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

2.Team Culture: The project fostered an environment of honesty, mutual support and respect.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

3.Team Culture: Individuals were supported when they found conditions stressful.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

4.Alliance Relationships: The combined urban consultant and urban client team decision-making process with regards to the day-to-day scope, programme, roles and responsibilities was effective.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

5.Alliance Relationships: The urban workstream worked seamlessly together in the best interest of the project.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

6.Organisational: The Urban team felt valued by other teams and had equal say in the outcomes.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

7.Methodology: The outline methodology in the RFP served the project well.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

8.Methodology: Highly creative multi-disciplinary processes were used to resolve design and strategy challenges.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

9.Programme: The timeframes were adequate for the required outputs.(Required.)

Give one or two examples to support your rating:

11.Experience: The project was a positive personal and professional experience for me.(Required.)

Give one or two examples of your most and least satisfying experience.