MGS 2020 Virtual Conference Participant Evaluation

1. Overall Conference Ratings

Question Title

1. Overall, how would you rate the virtual conference?

Excellent

Very good

Good

Fair

Poor

Question Title

2. What did you like most about the conference?

Question Title

3. What part of the conference needs the most improvement (your least favorite part)?

Question Title

4. Rate each portion of the virtual conference:

	Excellent	Very good	Good	Fair	Poor
Keynote (Dana Bradley)	Keynote (Dana Bradley) Excellent	Keynote (Dana Bradley) Very good	Keynote (Dana Bradley) Good	Keynote (Dana Bradley) Fair	Keynote (Dana Bradley) Poor
Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam)	Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam) Excellent	Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam) Very good	Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam) Good	Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam) Fair	Panel 1 (Sherrie Pugh, Nan Just, LaVerne Gilliam) Poor
Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley)	Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley) Excellent	Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley) Very good	Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley) Good	Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley) Fair	Panel 2 (Rajean Moone, Will Phillips, Patsy Bartley) Poor
Call to Action (Dan Pollock)	Call to Action (Dan Pollock) Excellent	Call to Action (Dan Pollock) Very good	Call to Action (Dan Pollock) Good	Call to Action (Dan Pollock) Fair	Call to Action (Dan Pollock) Poor

Comments?

Question Title

5. Suggestions for next year's conference theme, topics and/or presenters.