Advanced Issues in Family Law: Parent-Child Contact Problems Module 7 - January 16, 2025

Module 7 (Working through a Case. What to do and when to do it)

Trainers: Leslie M. Drozd, PhD; Matthew Sullivan, PhD; and Peggie Ward, PhD

Your feedback remains anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Based on the content of this training program segment, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree):

	1	2	3	4	5
1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships	1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships 1	1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships 2	1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships 3	1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships 4	1) Utilize a framework for setting up and delivering apologies in parent-child relationships 5
2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent	2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent 1	2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent 2	2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent 3	2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent 4	2) Analyze best practices to intervene in a PCCP case where there are allegations of parent-child gatekeeping, and a child is refusing contact with one parent 5

Question Title

* 2. Please rate trainer Leslie M. Drozd, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent):

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate trainer Matthew Sullivan, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent):

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate trainer Peggie Ward, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent):

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this training program segment overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this continuing education (CE) program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Question Title

* 7. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development
(1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Question Title

* 8. Additional Comments: