5th National Spinal Cord Injury Conference - Saturday, October 20, 2012

Question Title

* 1. How would you rate the Keynote Session 4, "Biomarkers in Acute SCI - A Translational Imperitive" by Dr. Brian Kwon? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the Keynote Session 5, "Gift of Wings" by Carl Hiebert? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

PLEASE ONLY COMPLETE THE WORKSHOP YOU HAVE ATTENDED.

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate Workshop 9, "Sitting Acquired Pressure Ulcers and Individualizing Risk"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jillian Swaine 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Michael Stacey 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate Workshop 10, "Capturing Capacity in SCI Rehabilitation in Canada: E-Scan Atlas"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dalton Wolfe 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jane Hsieh 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Erin Cherban 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate Workshop 11, "From Bench to Bedside: A Scientific Update from the Laboratory"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Sarah Figley 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Spyros Karadimas 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Ryan Salewski 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kajana Satkunendrarajah 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jared Wilcox 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate Workshop 12, "Trunk Control and its Implications on Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Milos Popovic 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cyril Duclos 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Dany Gagnon 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Richard Preuss 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE

Comments