5th National Spinal Cord Injury Conference - Friday, October 19, 2012

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about this event?

At Toronto Rehab

On Toronto Rehab’s website

From a direct e-mail from Toronto Rehab

Received brochure in the mail

Directly from one of the presenters

ASIA Conference

University of Toronto - MED Newsletter

SYNAPSE Newsletter

OPA

CARP

CPA

GTA Rehab

ABI

CAOT

University of Toronto Faculty of Nursing

National Spinal Cord Injury Association

American Association of SCI Nurses

International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Demographics: Please indicate your current position?

Rehab/ Medical Advisor

Case Manager

Consumer

Fitness Trainer

Kinesiologist

Medical Doctor

Nurse Practitioner

Occupational Therapist

Occupational Therapy Assistant

Physiatrist

Physician

Physical Therapist

Physiotherapist

Physiotherapy Assistant

Psychologist

Professor / Assistant Proffessor

Registered Dietician

Registered Nurse

Researcher / Research Assistant

Social Worker

Student

Technologist

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate the Keynote Session 1, "Retraining Walking after SCI to Induce Neuroplasticity and Useful Walking" by Dr. Jaynie Yang? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the Keynote Session 2, "SCI: Evidence-Based and Heuristic Approaches to Customization of Care for Cardiometabolic Syndrome" by Dr. Mark S. Nash? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate the Keynote Session 3, "Profiling Motor Control in SCI: Moving Towards Individualized Therapy and Evidence-Based Care" by Dr. Keith Tansey? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

PLEASE ONLY COMPLETE THE WORKSHOPS YOU HAVE ATTENDED.

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate Workshop 1, "Collection of Walking Measures for Best Practices in Rehabilitation and Inclusion in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHISCIR)"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Molly Verrier 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristina Guy 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Vanessa Noonan 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate Workshop 2, "SCI Patient Centred Primary Health Care - Best Practices in the Community"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen McMillan 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate Workshop 3, "Canadian Best Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers in the Spinal Cord Injured Individual"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Campbell 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Pamela Houghton 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - David Keast 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Laura Titus 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate Workshop 4, "Eat Well Live Well with SCI: Addressing Secondary Health Complications through Nutrition"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Joanne Smith 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kylie James 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate Workshop 5, "The International Standards for Autonomic Function: Practical "How To" Information and Review of Guidelines"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gavin le Nobel 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Kristen Walden 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 11. How would you rate Workshop 6, "SCI Rehabilitation Reveals Relationships of SCI Treatments with Patient Outcomes"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Julie Gassaway 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Gale Whiteneck 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate Workshop 7, "Your International Spinal Cord Injury Community: Getting Involved"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleen O'Connell 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 13. How would you rate Workshop 8, "Changing Minds, Changing Lives: Healthcare Professionals as Key Influencers"? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Robert Buren 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Jeffrey Andrion 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments

Question Title

* 14. How would you rate the Top 6 Articles You Need to Read? Please select the applicable number.

	1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	2 – DISAGREE	3 – NEUTRAL	4 – AGREE	5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Was consistent with learning objectives	Was consistent with learning objectives 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Was consistent with learning objectives 2 – DISAGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 3 – NEUTRAL	Was consistent with learning objectives 4 – AGREE	Was consistent with learning objectives 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Cathy Craven 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrea Townson 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen M. Smith 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Karen Ethans 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Andrei Krassioukov 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell 2 – DISAGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell 4 – AGREE	Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention - Colleeen O'Connell 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Information was relevant and useful to my practice	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 2 – DISAGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 3 – NEUTRAL	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 4 – AGREE	Information was relevant and useful to my practice 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 2 – DISAGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 3 – NEUTRAL	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 4 – AGREE	The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)
Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE (Yes)	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 2 – DISAGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 3 – NEUTRAL	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 4 – AGREE	Did you feel there were any commercial interests in this presentation 5 – STRONGLY AGREE (No)

Comments