Screen Reader Mode Icon Check SCREEN READER MODE to make this survey compatible with screen readers. ICANN81 | ccNSO Members Meeting satisfaction survey Question Title * 1. On a scale from 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the recent ccNSO Members Meeting? (5 being very satisfied) 0 (not satisfied) 5 (very satisfied) Clear i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale. OK Question Title * 2. Overall, the ccNSO Members Meeting agenda covered topics that were relevant to the interests and needs of my ccTLD. Agree Undecided Disagree Please explain, and be as specific as possible. OK Question Title * 3. Overall, the sessions were well organised, informative and engaging. Agree Undecided Disagree Please explain, and be as specific as possible. OK Question Title * 4. How would you rate the quality of the ccNSO Members Meeting sessions? very good good acceptable poor very poor I did not attend - Welcome Session - Welcome Session very good - Welcome Session good - Welcome Session acceptable - Welcome Session poor - Welcome Session very poor - Welcome Session I did not attend - GDC & WSIS+20 Session - GDC & WSIS+20 Session very good - GDC & WSIS+20 Session good - GDC & WSIS+20 Session acceptable - GDC & WSIS+20 Session poor - GDC & WSIS+20 Session very poor - GDC & WSIS+20 Session I did not attend - DNS Abuse Session - DNS Abuse Session very good - DNS Abuse Session good - DNS Abuse Session acceptable - DNS Abuse Session poor - DNS Abuse Session very poor - DNS Abuse Session I did not attend - Policy Gap Analysis Update - Policy Gap Analysis Update very good - Policy Gap Analysis Update good - Policy Gap Analysis Update acceptable - Policy Gap Analysis Update poor - Policy Gap Analysis Update very poor - Policy Gap Analysis Update I did not attend - ccTLD News Part 1 - ccTLD News Part 1 very good - ccTLD News Part 1 good - ccTLD News Part 1 acceptable - ccTLD News Part 1 poor - ccTLD News Part 1 very poor - ccTLD News Part 1 I did not attend - ccTLD News Part 2 - ccTLD News Part 2 very good - ccTLD News Part 2 good - ccTLD News Part 2 acceptable - ccTLD News Part 2 poor - ccTLD News Part 2 very poor - ccTLD News Part 2 I did not attend - Q&A with Council candidates - Q&A with Council candidates very good - Q&A with Council candidates good - Q&A with Council candidates acceptable - Q&A with Council candidates poor - Q&A with Council candidates very poor - Q&A with Council candidates I did not attend Please explain, and be as specific as possible. OK Question Title * 5. I was able to connect with peers, colleagues, or other stakeholders during the meeting. Much Somewhat Little Please explain, and be as specific as possible OK Question Title * 6. Did you feel encouraged to actively participate in discussions and sessions during the ccNSO Members Meeting? Yes Somewhat No Please explain why? OK Question Title * 7. What improvements, if any, would you suggest for the overall ccNSO Members Meeting experience? Please be as specific as possible. OK Question Title * 8. Which topic or session should be on the agenda at the next ccNSO Members meeting? OK Question Title * 9. Is there anything else you would like to share about your experience at the ccNSO Members Meeting? OK DONE