1. About this Survey

The following survey explores the contexts in which legal academics work, as part of a project funded by the UK Legal Education Research Network and conducted through the Melbourne Law School at the University of Melbourne, in association with the Faculty of Law at the University of Cambridge.

The results will be used to explore the factors that assist academics in building their careers and enacting their role/s through working in legal academia. The aggregate data from this survey will lead to academic publications, and will be stored for five years from the date of the last publication based on this survey. The data from this survey will only be used for this project.

Your responses and your institution will not be identifiable.

The survey should take no more than 25 minutes to complete.

In this survey, we talk about 'casual', 'zero-hour' and 'sessional' academic staff. By this, we mean staff employed on a short-term contract, with unpredictable hours of work. We also talk about 'tenured' and 'permanent' staff. By this, we mean people employed in an ongoing and predictable arrangement. When we refer to 'contract' and 'fixed-term' staff, we mean those who have a predictable period of employment, that will need to be renegotiated at the end of the term of the contract.

If you have any questions or comments about this survey, please contact Dr Alysia Blackham at lern.foi@gmail.com

This research project has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Melbourne (ID number 1646355.1). If you have any concerns or complaints about the conduct of this research project, which you do not wish to discuss with the research team, you should contact the Manager, Human Research Ethics, Office for Research Ethics and Integrity, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010. Tel: +61 3 8344 2073 or Fax: +61 3 9347 6739 or Email: HumanEthics-complaints@unimelb.edu.au. All complaints will be treated confidentially. In any correspondence please provide the name of the research team or the name or ethics ID number of the research project.

Question Title

* 1. With respect to the academic work that is undertaken by your law academics, how important are each of the following activities to the outcomes of your school or faculty?

  Not at all important Somewhat important Important Very important Critically important
Publish and disseminate  scholarly research.
Obtain external funding.
Design and deliver effective teaching.
Engage with external collaborators and groups (such as business, the legal profession, and community groups).
Undertake service or administrative roles within the university.
Supervise and graduate research students.
Lead groups, projects or initiatives.

Question Title

* 2. Which of the following activities might legal academics be asked to fulfill as part of their teaching duties?

  Not required Might be required Normally expected A core requirement
Designing and delivering lectures.
Supervising tutorials or skills sessions.
Coordinating other teachers or tutors.
Coordinating a full course. 
Designing assessments and curriculum activities. 
Organising extra-mural activities (e.g. moots)
Counselling students
Teaching administration (such as moderating or finalising results, addressing plagiarism and/or responding to requests for special consideration etc)

Question Title

* 3. How is your legal academic workforce configured?  Please estimate in terms of percentages.

Question Title

* 4. The following statements outline some of the roles academics perform as part of their teaching duties.  For each statement, please consider which types of appointments might be asked to undertake these duties. Please select any responses that apply.

  Tenured staff Fixed term staff Casual staff
Direct instructional activities (e.g. lecturing, supervision, tutoring)
Marking student work
Attending meetings
Administration (e.g. reporting, course coordination)
Evaluating and revising curricula
Counselling and supporting individual students
Coordinating or assisting with student extra-mural activities or events (e.g. moots, open days, information sessions)

Question Title

* 5. With respect to casual staff, for which of the following teaching-related duties would they be remunerated if they were asked to undertake them?

  Generally not remunerated Determined on a case by case basis Renumerated
Direct instructional activities (e.g. lecturing, supervision, tutoring)
Marking student work
Attending meetings
Administration (e.g. reporting, course coordination)
Evaluating and revising curricula
Counselling and supporting individual students
Coordinating or assisting with student extra-mural activities or events (e.g. moots, open days, information sessions)

Question Title

* 6. What are the benefits of deploying casuals as part of your academic workforce strategy? Please select any responses that apply. 

Question Title

* 7. What are the limitations of relying on a casual workforce for your particular faculty / school? Please select any responses that apply.

Page1 / 5
 

T