Screen Reader Mode Icon
The Minnesota Department of Transportation is conducting a survey of the Hwy 169 and Hwy 2 corridor through Grand Rapids and La Prairie. This survey will help us better understand the community's perspective on traffic flow, freight movement, pedestrian access, safety and other concerns along Hwy 169/Hwy 2. Please answer the following questions and share your feedback on how the corridor works for you.
Note: To the extent information submitted in connection with this survey identifies an individual or business, the information may be protected from disclosure under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA). Any identifying information you provide will not be associated with your individual survey responses. However, any identifying information will be accessible to MnDOT employees whose job reasonably requires access to the information, to anyone you specifically authorize to receive the information, pursuant to a court order, and by any other person or entity authorized by state or federal law. You are not obligated to respond to this survey, and there are no consequences if you do not respond. However, if you do not respond, MnDOT may not fully understand the public’s experience with this project.

Question Title

Image

Question Title

* 1. How do you use the Hwy 169/Hwy 2 corridor between Northwest 19th Avenue to Northeast 7th Street to the Mississippi River. Select all that apply.

Question Title

* 2. What zip code do you live in?

Question Title

* 3. How do you typically travel on the corridor? Select all that apply.

Question Title

* 4. About how frequently do you use the corridor?

Question Title

* 5. How satisfied are you with the current traffic flow of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 6. How satisfied are you with the current sidewalks and pedestrian connections along the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)

Question Title

* 7. How satisfied are you with the current pedestrian safety of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 8. How satisfied are you with the current bicycle connections and paths along the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)

Question Title

* 9. How satisfied are you with the current bicycle safety of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 10. How satisfied are you with the current access to local businesses of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 11. How satisfied are you with the current pavement quality of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 12. How satisfied are you with the current frequency of maintenance of the corridor? (1-very dissatisfied, 2-somewhat dissatisfied, 3-neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4-somewhat satisfied, 5-very satisfied)  

Question Title

* 13. What type of improvements would you like to see at the Hwy 169 and Hwy 2 intersection? Select all that apply.

Question Title

* 14. What type of improvements would you like to see along the corridor as a whole? Select all that apply.

Question Title

* 15. If bike and pedestrian safety and access along the corridor were improved, how likely would you be to walk or bike for short trips instead of using a personal automobile?

0 of 15 answered
 

T