Question Title

* 1. What is your overall rating of this course?

Question Title

* 2. What degree(s) do you have? (check all that apply)

Question Title

* 3. How many short courses have you taken?

Question Title

* 4. What percentage of the material in this course was new to you?

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate participant involvement in this course?

Question Title

* 6. How valuable were the course syllabus and handouts?

Question Title

* 7. How likely are you to use what you have learned in this course...

  Very likely Somewhat likely Neither likely nor unlikely Somewhat unlikely Unlikely
in your research?
in your teaching?
in your clinical work

Question Title

* 8. Was the course what you expected given the description in the conference materials?

Question Title

* 9. Would you recommend this course to a colleague who is interested in the topic?

Question Title

* 10. For whom would you recommend this course?

Question Title

* 11. CME Required Questions

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
1. The content was objective and balanced.
2. The content was evidence-based.
3. The type of evidence was identified.
4. The source of evidence was identified.
5. There was no inappropriate commercial bias toward any product.

Question Title

* 12. This course should be offered:

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the faculty: Angela Fagerlin, PhD

  Excellent Good Moderate Weak Poor
Enthusiasm
Knowledge
Presentation Skills

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the faculty: Mary Politi, PhD

  Excellent Good Moderate Weak Poor
Enthusiasm
Knowledge
Presentation Skills

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the faculty: Dominick L. Frosch, PhD

  Excellent Good Moderate Weak Poor
Enthusiasm
Knowledge
Presentation Skills

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the faculty: Karen R. Sepucha, PhD

  Excellent Good Moderate Weak Poor
Enthusiasm
Knowledge
Presentation Skills

Question Title

* 17. What were the best things about the course?

Question Title

* 18. What aspects of the course needed improvement?

Question Title

* 19. If you had additional time, what other short courses would you take?

  2nd choice 3rd choice 4th choice
FD 1. CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF MULTIPLE TREATMENT COMPARISONS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS
FD 2. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS FOR DECISION MAKING
AM 01. SMDM CORE COURSE: INTRODUCTION TO COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
AM 02. SMDM CORE COURSE: INTRODUCTION TO SHARED DECISION MAKING AND PATIENT DECISION AIDS
AM 04. SMDM CORE COURSE: INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGY OF MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
AM 05. A BEGINNERS’ GUIDE TO THE ART AND SCIENCE OF STATED-PREFERENCE METHODS
AM 08. INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM DYNAMICS FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES
AM 10. METHODS OF DISEASE MODEL CALIBRATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE
AM 11. MODELLING SURVIVAL DATA FOR DECISION ANALYSIS
AM 12. MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS METHODS FOR MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
AM 13. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FOR BEGINNERS
PM 01. ADVANCED EVIDENCE-BASED DIAGNOSIS (ROC CURVES, INTERVAL LIKELIHOOD RATIOS, AND BIAS IN TEST ACCURACY STUDIES)
PM 02. ADVANCED META-ANALYSIS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: SYNTHESIS METHODS FOR COMPLEX DATASETS
PM 03. ADVANCED TOPICS IN DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING
PM 04. ANALYZING PERSON-LEVEL COST-EFFECTIVENESS DATA: ESTIMATES AND UNCERTAINTY
PM 05. CAN WE TALK? MANAGING DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS
PM 06. COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH (CBPR): DEFINITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
PM 07. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS
PM 08. INTRODUCTION TO AGENT-BASED SIMULATION MODELING IN HEALTH CARE
PM 09. INTRODUCTION TO DESIGNING EVIDENCE-BASED PATIENT DECISION AIDS
PM 10. MEASURING PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN PREFERENCES TO INFORM BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS
PM 13. VALUE OF INFORMATION ANALYSIS: A BEGINNERS' GUIDE
PM 14. WHY DO PHYSICIANS NOT MAKE RATIONAL, EVIDENCE-BASED DECISIONS?

Question Title

* 20. Were there any short courses not offered that you would like to see in the future?

Question Title

* 21. Any other comments:

T