2017 Chicago Sports

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Learn Diagnostic Evaluation , Indications, Non-operative , Surgical Management and rehabilitation of complex shoulder instability patients.	Learn Diagnostic Evaluation , Indications, Non-operative , Surgical Management and rehabilitation of complex shoulder instability patients. Significantly Met	Learn Diagnostic Evaluation , Indications, Non-operative , Surgical Management and rehabilitation of complex shoulder instability patients. Somewhat Met	Learn Diagnostic Evaluation , Indications, Non-operative , Surgical Management and rehabilitation of complex shoulder instability patients. Not Met
Learn diagnostic evaluation, non-operative treatment, surgical indications, and rehabiliations for basic, complex and revision rotator cuff tear	Learn diagnostic evaluation, non-operative treatment, surgical indications, and rehabiliations for basic, complex and revision rotator cuff tear Significantly Met	Learn diagnostic evaluation, non-operative treatment, surgical indications, and rehabiliations for basic, complex and revision rotator cuff tear Somewhat Met	Learn diagnostic evaluation, non-operative treatment, surgical indications, and rehabiliations for basic, complex and revision rotator cuff tear Not Met
Review non-operative, surgical and rehabiliation management options for degenerative shoulder disease including non-operative care, arthroscopic indications and shoulder replacement strategies in the young active patient.	Review non-operative, surgical and rehabiliation management options for degenerative shoulder disease including non-operative care, arthroscopic indications and shoulder replacement strategies in the young active patient. Significantly Met	Review non-operative, surgical and rehabiliation management options for degenerative shoulder disease including non-operative care, arthroscopic indications and shoulder replacement strategies in the young active patient. Somewhat Met	Review non-operative, surgical and rehabiliation management options for degenerative shoulder disease including non-operative care, arthroscopic indications and shoulder replacement strategies in the young active patient. Not Met
Evaluate and treat basic and complex knee ligament injuries including surgical management, injury prevention and rehabilitation.	Evaluate and treat basic and complex knee ligament injuries including surgical management, injury prevention and rehabilitation. Significantly Met	Evaluate and treat basic and complex knee ligament injuries including surgical management, injury prevention and rehabilitation. Somewhat Met	Evaluate and treat basic and complex knee ligament injuries including surgical management, injury prevention and rehabilitation. Not Met
Identify, evaluate, and manage Femoral Acetabular Impingement and Labral Tears of the hip	Identify, evaluate, and manage Femoral Acetabular Impingement and Labral Tears of the hip Significantly Met	Identify, evaluate, and manage Femoral Acetabular Impingement and Labral Tears of the hip Somewhat Met	Identify, evaluate, and manage Femoral Acetabular Impingement and Labral Tears of the hip Not Met
Understand contemporary rehabilitation programs and return to play guidelines for common shoulder, knee and hip problems.	Understand contemporary rehabilitation programs and return to play guidelines for common shoulder, knee and hip problems. Significantly Met	Understand contemporary rehabilitation programs and return to play guidelines for common shoulder, knee and hip problems. Somewhat Met	Understand contemporary rehabilitation programs and return to play guidelines for common shoulder, knee and hip problems. Not Met
Understand contemporary rehabilitation techniques following cartilage procedures of the knee including timing to return to activities.	Understand contemporary rehabilitation techniques following cartilage procedures of the knee including timing to return to activities. Significantly Met	Understand contemporary rehabilitation techniques following cartilage procedures of the knee including timing to return to activities. Somewhat Met	Understand contemporary rehabilitation techniques following cartilage procedures of the knee including timing to return to activities. Not Met
Manage patients with meniscal deficiency, patellofemoral cartilage lesions or tibiofemoral articular cartilage defects.	Manage patients with meniscal deficiency, patellofemoral cartilage lesions or tibiofemoral articular cartilage defects. Significantly Met	Manage patients with meniscal deficiency, patellofemoral cartilage lesions or tibiofemoral articular cartilage defects. Somewhat Met	Manage patients with meniscal deficiency, patellofemoral cartilage lesions or tibiofemoral articular cartilage defects. Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION I: First Time Treatment Small Cartilage Defect

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI	Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI Good	Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Reiew of XR and MRI Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other	Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Small Defect Treatment Options: Debridement, OATS, Microfracture+, other Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION II: Failed Femoral Condyle Defect

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Good	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Poor
William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft	William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft Excellent	William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft Very Good	William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft Good	William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft Fair	William Bugbee, MD - Managing the Failed Femoral Condyle Defect: Evaluation, Subchondral Bone, Osteochondral Allograft Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION III: Meniscus Allograft Transplant

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Interview and Physical Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Good	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Review of XR and MRI Poor
Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation	Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Excellent	Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Very Good	Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Good	Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Fair	Alan Getgood, MD - Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Poor
Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes	Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes Excellent	Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes Very Good	Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes Good	Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes Fair	Tom Minas, MD - Tibio-Femoral Osteotomy: Decision Making, Techniques and Outcomes Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Rehabilitation Following Cartilage Procedures: Brace, Weight Bearing, Motion and Return to Activities Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION IV: Video Spotlight Session

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft	Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft Excellent	Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft Very Good	Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft Good	Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft Fair	Jack Farr, MD - Osteochondral Allograft Poor
Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft	Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft Excellent	Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft Very Good	Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft Good	Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft Fair	Jas Chahal, MD - Natural Tissue Graft Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate	Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate Good	Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Bone Marrow Aspirate Poor
Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture	Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture Excellent	Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture Very Good	Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture Good	Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture Fair	Michael Ellman, MD - Microfracture Poor
Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System	Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System Excellent	Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System Very Good	Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System Good	Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System Fair	Eric Strauss, MD - Osteoarticular Transfer System Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION V: Osteochondritis Dissecans

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical	Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Patiend Interview and Physical Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Poor
Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD Excellent	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD Very Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD Fair	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Lecture: Management of OCD Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VI: First Time Management of a Patellofemoral Defect

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical	Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Patient Intervew and Physical Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Review of XR and MRI Poor
Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions	Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions Excellent	Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions Very Good	Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions Good	Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions Fair	Jack Farr, MD - Management of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions Poor
Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI	Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI Excellent	Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI Very Good	Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI Good	Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI Fair	Tom Minas, MD - Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation/MACI Poor
Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone	Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone Excellent	Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone Very Good	Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone Good	Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone Fair	Jack Farr, MD - Management of the Subchondral Bone Poor
Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease	Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease Excellent	Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease Very Good	Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease Good	Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease Fair	Christian Latterman,MD - Biologics and the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Disease Poor
Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ	Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ Excellent	Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ Very Good	Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ Good	Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ Fair	Brian cole, MD - The Athlete and Cartilage Repair: How Do They Differ Poor
Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions	Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions Excellent	Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions Very Good	Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions Good	Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions Fair	Andreas Gomoll, MD - Future Directions in Cartilage Repair: Near Term Solutions Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: Shoulder Instability

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam	Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Excellent	Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Very Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Fair	Nikhil Verma, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Poor
Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues	Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues Excellent	Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues Very Good	Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues Good	Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues Fair	Eric McCarty, MD - Conservative Management and In Season Issues Poor
Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide?	Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide? Excellent	Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide? Very Good	Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide? Good	Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide? Fair	Greg Nicholson, MD - Open and Arthroscopic: How Do I Decide? Poor
Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability	Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability Excellent	Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability Very Good	Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability Good	Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability Fair	Matthew Provencher, MD - Bone Loss and Instability Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport?	Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport? Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport? Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport? Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport? Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - RehabL How and When to Return to Sport? Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now?	Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now? Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now? Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now? Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now? Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Revision Instability: What Do I Do Now? Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VIII: Biceps/SLAP

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam	Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Excellent	Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Very Good	Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Good	Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Fair	Ian Lo, MD - Patient Presentation and Exam Poor
Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real?	Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real? Excellent	Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real? Very Good	Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real? Good	Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real? Fair	Michael Cicotti, MD - SLAP Tears: Are They Real? Poor
Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When	Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When Excellent	Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When Very Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When Fair	Nikhil Verma, MD - SLAP Repair: How and When Poor
Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What?	Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What? Excellent	Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What? Very Good	Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What? Good	Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What? Fair	Matthew Provencher, M D_ Failed SLAP Management: Now and What? Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport	Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - SLAP/Biceps: Rehab and Return to Sport Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION IX: Rotator Cuff

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works	Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works Excellent	Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works Very Good	Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works Good	Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works Fair	Jas Chahal, MD - Non-Operative Management: It Still Works Poor
Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm Excellent	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm Very Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm Fair	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Partial Rotator Cuff: treatment Algorithm Poor
Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists	Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists Excellent	Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists Very Good	Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists Good	Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists Fair	Travis Orth, PT - Current Concepts on the Genetic Factors in Rotator Cuff Pathology and Future Implications for Sports Physical Therapists Poor

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION X: Massive Cuff

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam Good	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Patient Presentation & Exam Poor
George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient	George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient Excellent	George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient Very Good	George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient Good	George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient Fair	George Davies, DPT - Rehab of the Cuff Patient Poor
Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option	Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option Excellent	Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option Very Good	Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option Good	Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option Fair	Ian Lo, MD - Repair is Still the Best Option Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options	Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options Good	Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Alternate Options Poor
Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger Excellent	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger Very Good	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger Good	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger Fair	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Reverse Arthroplasty: When Do I Pull the Trigger Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We?	Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We? Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We? Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We? Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We? Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Biologics Where are We? Poor

Question Title

* 20. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 21, and rate those speakers.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization Excellent	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization Very Good	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization Good	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization Fair	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Stabilization Poor
Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair	Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair Excellent	Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair Very Good	Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair Good	Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair Fair	Michael Cicotti, MD 0 SLAP Repair Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis	Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Sub-Pec Tenodesis Poor
Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis Excellent	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis Very Good	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis Good	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis Fair	Scott Trenhaile, MD - Arthroscopic Tenodesis Poor
Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair	Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair Excellent	Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair Very Good	Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair Good	Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair Fair	Ian Lo, MD - Subscap Repair Poor
Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair	Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair Excellent	Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair Very Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair Fair	Nikhil Verma, MD - Massive Cuff Repair Poor
Eric McCarty, MD - SSN	Eric McCarty, MD - SSN Excellent	Eric McCarty, MD - SSN Very Good	Eric McCarty, MD - SSN Good	Eric McCarty, MD - SSN Fair	Eric McCarty, MD - SSN Poor

Question Title

* 21. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 22.
If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete	Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - What's New in the Rehab in the Overhead Athlete Poor
George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries	George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries Excellent	George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries Very Good	George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries Good	George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries Fair	George Davies, DPT - Criteria for Return to Sports for Shoulder Injuries Poor
Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player	Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player Excellent	Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player Very Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player Fair	Michael Reinold, DPT - Preventative Programs for Youth Baseball Player Poor

Question Title

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XI: The Athletic Arthritic Shoulder

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work?	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work? Excellent	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work? Very Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work? Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work? Fair	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Capsular Release: Does it Work? Poor
Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty	Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty Excellent	Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty Very Good	Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty Good	Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty Fair	Nikhil Verman, MD - Alternatives to Arthroplasty Poor
Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient	Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient Excellent	Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient Very Good	Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient Good	Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient Fair	Matthew Provencher, MD - Arthroplasty in the Young Patient Poor
Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient Excellent	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient Very Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient Fair	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehab strategies & Techniques to Maintain Shoulder Function in the Arthritic Shoulder Patient Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure	Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: It's a Soft Tissue Procedure Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science	Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Principles and Science Poor
Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now?	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now? Excellent	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now? Very Good	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now? Good	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now? Fair	Gregory Nicholson, MD - Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Do We Do Now? Poor
Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total Excellent	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total Very Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total Good	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total Fair	Michael Reinold, DPT - Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Arthroplasty: Reverse and Total Poor

Question Title

* 23. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XII: Knee I

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament	Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Good	Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Poor
Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament	Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Excellent	Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Very Good	Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Good	Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Fair	Jack Farr, MD - Case Based Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Poor
Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery	Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery Excellent	Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery Very Good	Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery Good	Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery Fair	Russ Paine, PT - Rehab & return to Sport Criteria Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury or Surgery Poor
Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics	Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics Excellent	Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics Very Good	Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics Good	Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics Fair	Brian Cole, MD - Knee Injecitions/Biologics Poor

Question Title

* 24. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XIII: Knee II

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention	Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention Excellent	Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention Very Good	Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention Good	Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention Fair	Timothy Hewett, MD - ACL Prevention Poor
Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry	Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry Excellent	Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry Very Good	Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry Good	Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry Fair	Brian Forsythe, MD - ACL Anatomy and Isometry Poor
Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique	Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique Excellent	Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique Very Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique Fair	Nikhil Verma, MD - ACL: Evolution of a Technique Poor
Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab	Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab Excellent	Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab Very Good	Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab Good	Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab Fair	Russ Paine, PT - Post ACL Rehab Poor
Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations	Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations Excellent	Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations Very Good	Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations Good	Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations Fair	Bernard Bach, Jr, MD - Revision ACL Considerations Poor
Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better	Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better Excellent	Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better Very Good	Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better Good	Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better Fair	Josh Harris, MD - ACL Outcomes: Are We Doing Better Poor
Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament Excellent	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament Very Good	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament Good	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament Fair	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL: Beyond the Ligament Poor
Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers	Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers Excellent	Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers Very Good	Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers Good	Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers Fair	Russ Paine, PT - ACL Copers Poor
Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC	Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC Excellent	Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC Very Good	Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC Good	Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC Fair	Michael Ellman, MD - LCL-PLC Poor
Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL	Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL Excellent	Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL Very Good	Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL Good	Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL Fair	Charles Bush-Joseph, MD - PCL Poor

Question Title

* 25. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 26, and rate those speakers.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release Excellent	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release Very Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release Good	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release Fair	Geoffrey Van Thiel, MD - Shoulder Capsular Release Poor
Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem?	Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem? Excellent	Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem? Very Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem? Good	Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem? Fair	Anthony Romeo, MD - Shoulder Arthroplasty: Do We Need a Stem? Poor
Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss	Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss Excellent	Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss Very Good	Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss Good	Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss Fair	Greg Nicholson, MD - Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Management of Glenoid Bone Loss Poor
Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy	Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy Excellent	Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy Very Good	Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy Good	Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy Fair	Adam Yanke, MD - MPFL Made Easy Poor
Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation Excellent	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation Very Good	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation Good	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation Fair	Alan Getgood, MD - ACL Augmentation Poor
Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL	Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL Excellent	Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL Very Good	Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL Good	Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL Fair	Brian Forsythe, MD - MY ACL Poor
Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial	Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial Excellent	Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial Very Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial Good	Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial Fair	Nikhil Verma, MD - Anatomic Transtibial Poor
Michael Ellman, MD - PCL	Michael Ellman, MD - PCL Excellent	Michael Ellman, MD - PCL Very Good	Michael Ellman, MD - PCL Good	Michael Ellman, MD - PCL Fair	Michael Ellman, MD - PCL Poor
Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair	Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair Excellent	Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair Very Good	Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair Good	Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair Fair	Jack Farr, MD - Root Repair Poor

Question Title

* 26. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 27.
If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery	Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery Excellent	Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery Very Good	Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery Good	Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery Fair	Russ Paine, PT - Return to Sport Criteria Following ACL Surgery Poor
Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate)	Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Excellent	Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Very Good	Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Good	Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Fair	Russ Paine, PT - Slower is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate)	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Fast is Better (ACL Rehabilitation Socratic Debate) Poor
Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab Excellent	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab Very Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab Good	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab Fair	Kevin Wilk, DPT - Non-Surgical Patellofemoral Rehab Poor

Question Title

* 27. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XIV: Hip Session I - Femoroacetabular Impingement

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam	Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam Excellent	Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam Very Good	Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam Good	Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam Fair	Hal Martin, DO - Hip Patient Presentation and Exam Poor
Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation	Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation Excellent	Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation Very Good	Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation Good	Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation Fair	Michael J Salata, MD - Radiographic and Advanced Imaging Evaluation Poor
Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI	Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI Excellent	Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI Very Good	Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI Good	Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI Fair	Shane Nho, MD - Hip Arthroscopy for the Labral Injury and FAI Poor
Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery	Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery Excellent	Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery Very Good	Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery Good	Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery Fair	Michael Stover, MD - Open Hip Preservation Surgery Poor
Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery	Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery Excellent	Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery Very Good	Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery Good	Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery Fair	Phillip Malloy, MSPT - Rehabilitation following Labral Repair &/Or FAI Surgery Poor
Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip	Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip Excellent	Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip Very Good	Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip Good	Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip Fair	Richard Mather, MD - Approach to Failed Hip Poor

Question Title

* 28. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XV: Hip Session II - Extra Articular Hip & Pelvis Pathology

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury	Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury Excellent	Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury Very Good	Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury Good	Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury Fair	Michael Salata, MD - Core Muscle Injury Poor
Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome	Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Excellent	Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Very Good	Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Good	Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Fair	Shane Nho, MD - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Poor
Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury	Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury Excellent	Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury Very Good	Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury Good	Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury Fair	Richard Mather, MD - Proximal Hamstring Injury Poor
Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome	Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome Excellent	Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome Very Good	Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome Good	Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome Fair	Hal Martin, MD - Deep Gluteal Space Syndrome Poor
Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction	Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction Excellent	Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction Very Good	Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction Good	Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction Fair	Josh Harris, MD - Pelvic and Sacral Dysfunction Poor
Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction	Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction Excellent	Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction Very Good	Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction Good	Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction Fair	Catherine Stegemann, PT - Physical Therapy for Pelvic/Sacrum/Lumbar Dysfunction Poor

Question Title

* 29. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 30. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 31. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 32. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 33. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 34. Physical Therapists/Athletic Trainers: Please provide your License Number

Question Title

* 35.
PHYSICIANS: The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 31 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

ATHLETIC TRAINERS: Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) (BOC AP# P3115) is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to provide continuing education to Athletic Trainers. This program is eligible for a maximum of 31 EBP Category hours/CEUs. ATs should claim only those hours actually spent in the educational program.

PHYSICAL THERAPISTS: The Illinois Chapter Continuing Education Committee has certified that this course meets the criteria for approval of Continuing Education offerings established by The Illinois Physical Therapy Association. The IPTA has approved this course for 32.5 CE hours

Please attest to the number of Credit Hours you've earned below:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION I: First Time Treatment Small Cartilage Defect

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION II: Failed Femoral Condyle Defect

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION III: Meniscus Allograft Transplant

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION IV: Video Spotlight Session

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION V: Osteochondritis Dissecans

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION VI: First Time Management of a Patellofemoral Defect

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION VII: Shoulder Instability

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION VIII: Biceps/SLAP

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION IX: Rotator Cuff

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION X: Massive Cuff

Question Title

* 20. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 21, and rate those speakers.

Question Title

* 21. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 22.If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

Question Title

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION XI: The Athletic Arthritic Shoulder

Question Title

* 23. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION XII: Knee I

Question Title

* 24. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION XIII: Knee II

Question Title

* 25. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 26, and rate those speakers.

Question Title

* 26. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 27.If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

Question Title

* 27. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION XIV: Hip Session I - Femoroacetabular Impingement

Question Title

* 28. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakersSESSION XV: Hip Session II - Extra Articular Hip & Pelvis Pathology

Question Title

* 29. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 30. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 31. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 32. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 33. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 34. Physical Therapists/Athletic Trainers: Please provide your License Number

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION I: First Time Treatment Small Cartilage Defect

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION II: Failed Femoral Condyle Defect

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION III: Meniscus Allograft Transplant

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION IV: Video Spotlight Session

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION V: Osteochondritis Dissecans

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VI: First Time Management of a Patellofemoral Defect

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: Shoulder Instability

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION VIII: Biceps/SLAP

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION IX: Rotator Cuff

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION X: Massive Cuff

* 20. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 21, and rate those speakers.

* 21. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 22.
If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

* 22. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XI: The Athletic Arthritic Shoulder

* 23. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XII: Knee I

* 24. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XIII: Knee II

* 25. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please rate the following speakers. If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please skip to question 26, and rate those speakers.

* 26. CONCURRENT SESSIONS:
If you attended the PHYSICIAN:Technique Corner session. please skip to question 27.
If you attended the THERAPY: Rehabilitation session, please rate the following speakers.

* 27. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XIV: Hip Session I - Femoroacetabular Impingement

* 28. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Chicago Sports Medicine Symposium speakers
SESSION XV: Hip Session II - Extra Articular Hip & Pelvis Pathology