Learning Objective:

After attending this workshop, the participants will be able to:
  1. Perform and interpret VExUS scan and know limitations of VExUS in volume status estimation.
  2. Perform modified TTE views including suprasternal and right parasternal views to diagnose and quantify intracardiac congenital and iatrogenic shunts, assess physiological status of corrected and palliated adult congenital heart diseases, Load independent assessment of contractility.
  3. Perform TTE views to check and quantify functionality of Cardiac assist devices, LAVD, Impala, ECMO including RAM testing and interpretation.
  4. Perform TTE views for FALS and Blue protocol, LVOT VTI protocol for hemodynamic assessment and shock differentiation, quantification for 60/60 rule to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism.
  5. Diagnose and interpret TTE images of various clinical situations encountered in critical care.

Question Title

* 1. Workshop Evaluation

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The objectives of the workshop were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/ or knowledge
I gained new perspective on my current practice
The form provided for obtaining feedback worked well
The equipment used in this workshop worked well to achieve the learning objectives
This workshop should be repeated at future meetings

Question Title

* 2. This workshop encouraged me to consider changes to my practice

Question Title

* 3. Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?

Question Title

* 4. Facilitator: Professor Virendra K. Arya

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
was supportive in meeting the workshop objectives
contributed to a positive workshop experience

Question Title

* 5. Instructor: Dr Vikas Dutta

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
communicated instructions clearly and effectively
was knowledgeable about this topic 
provided me with specific and helpful feedback 
provided sufficient time for discussion 

Question Title

* 6. Instructor: Dr Mullein Thorleifson

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
communicated instructions clearly and effectively
was knowledgeable about this topic 
provided me with specific and helpful feedback 
provided sufficient time for discussion 

Question Title

* 7. Instructor: Professor Kathirvel Subramaniam

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
communicated instructions clearly and effectively
was knowledgeable about this topic 
provided me with specific and helpful feedback 
provided sufficient time for discussion 

Question Title

* 8. The workshop and instructors were balanced and free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 9. Topic suggestions for future workshops

Question Title

* 10. Other comments

Thank you for completing the evaluation!

T