GCFI73 Evaluation

Welcome to the GCFI73 Evaluation Survey. Thank you for agreeing to participate and share your opinions in order to improve future GCFI meetings

Question Title

* 1. Please select all sessions that you attended at GCFI73

Opening Keynote by RDML Tim Gallaudet

GCFI Membership Meeting

E-Poster Session

Recreational Fisheries Special Session

Thematic Keynote: Prof. Warren Potts

CINEFISH Film Festival

Thematic Keynote: Dr. Cesar Toro

Thematic Keynote: Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi

Fishers Forum

Meet the Board Social

Story Slam & Closing Ceremony

Question Title

* 2. How would you describe your experience at GCFI73 in terms of:

	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor	Not applicable
The overall program	The overall program Very Good	The overall program Good	The overall program Fair	The overall program Poor	The overall program Very Poor	The overall program Not applicable
Comments
Knowledge gained	Knowledge gained Very Good	Knowledge gained Good	Knowledge gained Fair	Knowledge gained Poor	Knowledge gained Very Poor	Knowledge gained Not applicable
Comments
Networking and socialising opportunities	Networking and socialising opportunities Very Good	Networking and socialising opportunities Good	Networking and socialising opportunities Fair	Networking and socialising opportunities Poor	Networking and socialising opportunities Very Poor	Networking and socialising opportunities Not applicable
Comments
Overall enjoyment of the week	Overall enjoyment of the week Very Good	Overall enjoyment of the week Good	Overall enjoyment of the week Fair	Overall enjoyment of the week Poor	Overall enjoyment of the week Very Poor	Overall enjoyment of the week Not applicable
Comments

Question Title

* 3. How satisfied were you with GCFI73 in terms of

	Very Satisfied	Satisfied	Neutral	Unsatisfied	Very Unsatisfied	Not applicable
Date and Time	Date and Time Very Satisfied	Date and Time Satisfied	Date and Time Neutral	Date and Time Unsatisfied	Date and Time Very Unsatisfied	Date and Time Not applicable
Comments
Ease of Accessibility	Ease of Accessibility Very Satisfied	Ease of Accessibility Satisfied	Ease of Accessibility Neutral	Ease of Accessibility Unsatisfied	Ease of Accessibility Very Unsatisfied	Ease of Accessibility Not applicable
Comments
Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube)	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Very Satisfied	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Satisfied	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Neutral	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Unsatisfied	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Very Unsatisfied	Suitability of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Not applicable
Comments
Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube)	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Very Satisfied	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Satisfied	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Neutral	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Unsatisfied	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Very Unsatisfied	Overall delivery quality of online platforms used (Zoom & YouTube) Not applicable
Comments
Networking Opportunities	Networking Opportunities Very Satisfied	Networking Opportunities Satisfied	Networking Opportunities Neutral	Networking Opportunities Unsatisfied	Networking Opportunities Very Unsatisfied	Networking Opportunities Not applicable
Comments

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the effectiveness of different communication approaches for sharing information related to GCFI73

	Very Useful	Useful	Moderately Useful	Somewhat Useful	Not Useful	Not applicable
Website	Website Very Useful	Website Useful	Website Moderately Useful	Website Somewhat Useful	Website Not Useful	Website Not applicable
Comments
Social media	Social media Very Useful	Social media Useful	Social media Moderately Useful	Social media Somewhat Useful	Social media Not Useful	Social media Not applicable
Comments
General Emails to GCFI-Net	General Emails to GCFI-Net Very Useful	General Emails to GCFI-Net Useful	General Emails to GCFI-Net Moderately Useful	General Emails to GCFI-Net Somewhat Useful	General Emails to GCFI-Net Not Useful	General Emails to GCFI-Net Not applicable
Comments
Daily Emails during the conference	Daily Emails during the conference Very Useful	Daily Emails during the conference Useful	Daily Emails during the conference Moderately Useful	Daily Emails during the conference Somewhat Useful	Daily Emails during the conference Not Useful	Daily Emails during the conference Not applicable
Comments

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the Keynote Presentations

	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor	Not Applicable
RDML Tim Gallaudet	RDML Tim Gallaudet Very Good	RDML Tim Gallaudet Good	RDML Tim Gallaudet Fair	RDML Tim Gallaudet Poor	RDML Tim Gallaudet Very Poor	RDML Tim Gallaudet Not Applicable
Any other comments?
Prof. Warren Potts	Prof. Warren Potts Very Good	Prof. Warren Potts Good	Prof. Warren Potts Fair	Prof. Warren Potts Poor	Prof. Warren Potts Very Poor	Prof. Warren Potts Not Applicable
Any other comments?
Dr. Cesar Toro	Dr. Cesar Toro Very Good	Dr. Cesar Toro Good	Dr. Cesar Toro Fair	Dr. Cesar Toro Poor	Dr. Cesar Toro Very Poor	Dr. Cesar Toro Not Applicable
Any other comments?
Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Very Good	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Good	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Fair	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Poor	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Very Poor	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Not Applicable
Any other comments?

Question Title

* 6. How much did the Keynote Presentations contribute to your knowledge of specific issues in the Gulf and Caribbean Region?

	Alot	Somewhat	A little	Not at all	Prefer not to answer
RDML Tim Gallaudet	RDML Tim Gallaudet Alot	RDML Tim Gallaudet Somewhat	RDML Tim Gallaudet A little	RDML Tim Gallaudet Not at all	RDML Tim Gallaudet Prefer not to answer
Any other comments?
Prof. Warren Potts	Prof. Warren Potts Alot	Prof. Warren Potts Somewhat	Prof. Warren Potts A little	Prof. Warren Potts Not at all	Prof. Warren Potts Prefer not to answer
Any other comments?
Dr. Cesar Toro	Dr. Cesar Toro Alot	Dr. Cesar Toro Somewhat	Dr. Cesar Toro A little	Dr. Cesar Toro Not at all	Dr. Cesar Toro Prefer not to answer
Any other comments?
Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Alot	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Somewhat	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi A little	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Not at all	Dr. Yvette Diei-Ouadi Prefer not to answer
Any other comments?

Question Title

* 7. Do you have any recommendations for future Keynote Speakers at GCFI?

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the quality of the Special Session: Recreational fisheries management in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean: Recent discoveries, current challenges, and future opportunities in terms of

	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor	Not Applicable
General Content	General Content Very Good	General Content Good	General Content Fair	General Content Poor	General Content Very Poor	General Content Not Applicable
Facilitators	Facilitators Very Good	Facilitators Good	Facilitators Fair	Facilitators Poor	Facilitators Very Poor	Facilitators Not Applicable
Presentations	Presentations Very Good	Presentations Good	Presentations Fair	Presentations Poor	Presentations Very Poor	Presentations Not Applicable
Panel Discussions	Panel Discussions Very Good	Panel Discussions Good	Panel Discussions Fair	Panel Discussions Poor	Panel Discussions Very Poor	Panel Discussions Not Applicable
Geographic relevance	Geographic relevance Very Good	Geographic relevance Good	Geographic relevance Fair	Geographic relevance Poor	Geographic relevance Very Poor	Geographic relevance Not Applicable
Networking Opportunities	Networking Opportunities Very Good	Networking Opportunities Good	Networking Opportunities Fair	Networking Opportunities Poor	Networking Opportunities Very Poor	Networking Opportunities Not Applicable

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 9. How much did this special session contribute to your knowledge of recreational fisheries management in the Gulf and Caribbean Region?

	Alot	Somewhat	A little	Not at all	Prefer not to answer
Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges	Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges Alot	Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges Somewhat	Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges A little	Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges Not at all	Panel Discussion 1: Recreational fisheries management in the last ten years – lessons learned, current efforts and challenges Prefer not to answer
Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management	Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management Alot	Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management Somewhat	Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management A little	Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management Not at all	Panel Discussion 2: Needs and opportunities for greater regional collaboration for recreational fisheries management Prefer not to answer
Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean.	Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Alot	Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Somewhat	Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. A little	Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Not at all	Workshop: Next steps to advance sustainable recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Prefer not to answer

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 10. As an E-Poster PRESENTER, please provide your feedback on the Learning Toolbox Platform:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Not Applicable
The platform was easy to use	The platform was easy to use Strongly Agree	The platform was easy to use Agree	The platform was easy to use Neutral	The platform was easy to use Disagree	The platform was easy to use Strongly Disagree	The platform was easy to use Not Applicable
The support provided was sufficient	The support provided was sufficient Strongly Agree	The support provided was sufficient Agree	The support provided was sufficient Neutral	The support provided was sufficient Disagree	The support provided was sufficient Strongly Disagree	The support provided was sufficient Not Applicable
Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Strongly Agree	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Agree	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Neutral	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Disagree	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Strongly Disagree	Being able to contact the GCFI73 E-Support team was helpful Not Applicable
I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Strongly Agree	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Agree	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Neutral	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Disagree	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Strongly Disagree	I enjoyed the creativity it allowed for presenting my work Not Applicable
The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Strongly Agree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Agree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Neutral	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Disagree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Strongly Disagree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Not Applicable
I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Strongly Agree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Agree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Neutral	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Disagree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Strongly Disagree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Not Applicable

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 11. As an E-Poster VIEWER, please provide your feedback on the Learning Toolbox Platform:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Not Applicable
The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Strongly Agree	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Agree	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Neutral	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Disagree	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Strongly Disagree	The platform was easy to use and I was able to find the poster(s) I was interested in Not Applicable
The support provided was sufficient	The support provided was sufficient Strongly Agree	The support provided was sufficient Agree	The support provided was sufficient Neutral	The support provided was sufficient Disagree	The support provided was sufficient Strongly Disagree	The support provided was sufficient Not Applicable
The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Strongly Agree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Agree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Neutral	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Disagree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Strongly Disagree	The built-in chat-box combined with breakout rooms during the e-poster session was sufficient to engage with the audience Not Applicable
I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Strongly Agree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Agree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Neutral	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Disagree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Strongly Disagree	I would recommend this e-poster approach for future GCFI meetings Not Applicable

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 12. Please provide your feedback on the CINEFISH Film Festival & CINEFISH At Home

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Not Applicable
The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Strongly Agree	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Agree	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Neutral	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Disagree	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Strongly Disagree	The films were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Not Applicable
The geographical diversity of films was great	The geographical diversity of films was great Strongly Agree	The geographical diversity of films was great Agree	The geographical diversity of films was great Neutral	The geographical diversity of films was great Disagree	The geographical diversity of films was great Strongly Disagree	The geographical diversity of films was great Not Applicable
The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Strongly Agree	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Agree	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Neutral	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Disagree	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Strongly Disagree	The CINEFISH At Home approach should be incorporated in future GCFI meetings so films could be watched at the viewers’ convenience Not Applicable

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your feedback on the GCFI73 Story Slam

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Not Applicable
The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Strongly Agree	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Agree	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Neutral	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Disagree	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Strongly Disagree	The stories were interesting and I enjoyed the diversity of topics presented Not Applicable
I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Strongly Agree	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Agree	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Neutral	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Disagree	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Strongly Disagree	I recommend that a similar event be included in future GCFI meetings Not Applicable

Any other comments?

Question Title

* 14. Although the Speed Science Student Competition event was cancelled this year, what do you think about this format and about including a similar event at future GCFI Meetings?

I am in favour

I am not in favour

Not sure

Not applicable

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 15. Did you learn something at GCFI73 that you will apply in your studies / work / future decisions?

Yes

Maybe

Not Applicable

Comment

Question Title

* 16. What were your favorite aspects of our virtual approach that you would like us to incorporate in future meetings?

Question Title

* 17. What were your least favorite aspects of our virtual approach that you would like us to avoid in future meetings?

Question Title

* 18. Did you like the mix of science and fun activities provided at GCFI73?

Yes

Maybe

Not Applicable

Comment

Question Title

* 19. What were the challenges/opportunities for improvements?

Question Title

* 20. What recommendations/topics would you like to see included for future meetings?

Question Title

* 21. What locations in the Wider Caribbean Region would you like the GCFI Board of Directors to consider for future GCFIs?

Question Title

* 22. Are there any tools or resources that the GCFI could provide to better enable you to share or acquire knowledge, before, during, or after the annual meetings?

Question Title

* 23. Select the option that best represents you

Academic

Researcher

Student

NGO/CBO

Government/Policy maker

Private sector

Fisherfolk

Representative from fisheries sector

Intergovernmental

Donor

Other (please specify)

GCFI73 Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Please select all sessions that you attended at GCFI73

Question Title

* 2. How would you describe your experience at GCFI73 in terms of:

Question Title

* 3. How satisfied were you with GCFI73 in terms of

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the effectiveness of different communication approaches for sharing information related to GCFI73

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the Keynote Presentations

Question Title

* 6. How much did the Keynote Presentations contribute to your knowledge of specific issues in the Gulf and Caribbean Region?

Question Title

* 7. Do you have any recommendations for future Keynote Speakers at GCFI?

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the quality of the Special Session: Recreational fisheries management in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean: Recent discoveries, current challenges, and future opportunities in terms of

Question Title

* 9. How much did this special session contribute to your knowledge of recreational fisheries management in the Gulf and Caribbean Region?

Question Title

* 10. As an E-Poster PRESENTER, please provide your feedback on the Learning Toolbox Platform:

Question Title

* 11. As an E-Poster VIEWER, please provide your feedback on the Learning Toolbox Platform:

Question Title

* 12. Please provide your feedback on the CINEFISH Film Festival & CINEFISH At Home

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your feedback on the GCFI73 Story Slam

Question Title

* 14. Although the Speed Science Student Competition event was cancelled this year, what do you think about this format and about including a similar event at future GCFI Meetings?

Question Title

* 15. Did you learn something at GCFI73 that you will apply in your studies / work / future decisions?

Question Title

* 16. What were your favorite aspects of our virtual approach that you would like us to incorporate in future meetings?

Question Title

* 17. What were your least favorite aspects of our virtual approach that you would like us to avoid in future meetings?

Question Title

* 18. Did you like the mix of science and fun activities provided at GCFI73?

Question Title

* 19. What were the challenges/opportunities for improvements?

Question Title

* 20. What recommendations/topics would you like to see included for future meetings?

Question Title

* 21. What locations in the Wider Caribbean Region would you like the GCFI Board of Directors to consider for future GCFIs?

Question Title

* 22. Are there any tools or resources that the GCFI could provide to better enable you to share or acquire knowledge, before, during, or after the annual meetings?

Question Title

* 23. Select the option that best represents you

Question Title

* 24. Your country

Question Title

* 25. Any other comments?