Exit this survey

Copenhagen IC22 - Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: from indications to innovations

Question Title

* 1. Participant Name:

Question Title

* 2. Professional Situation:

Resident

University

Hospital Staff

Ophthalmic Assistant

Private Practice

Industry

Question Title

* 3. What was your main reason for choosing this course?

Interesting Topic

Good Faculty

Well-known Course Director

Question Title

* 4. How did you rate the content of this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

1

2

3

4

5

Question Title

* 5. How useful was the course for your clinical practice? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

1

2

3

4

5

Question Title

* 6. Did all listed faculty members attend this course?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 7. Was the course free from commercial bias?

Yes

No

If no, what was the bias?

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course?

Question Title

* 9. How did you rate the quality of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
M. Cortina	M. Cortina 1	M. Cortina 2	M. Cortina 3	M. Cortina 4	M. Cortina 5
S. Hannush	S. Hannush 1	S. Hannush 2	S. Hannush 3	S. Hannush 4	S. Hannush 5
E. Arrondo	E. Arrondo 1	E. Arrondo 2	E. Arrondo 3	E. Arrondo 4	E. Arrondo 5
J. de la Cruz	J. de la Cruz 1	J. de la Cruz 2	J. de la Cruz 3	J. de la Cruz 4	J. de la Cruz 5

Question Title

* 10. How did you rate the standard of English of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
M. Cortina	M. Cortina 1	M. Cortina 2	M. Cortina 3	M. Cortina 4	M. Cortina 5
S. Hannush	S. Hannush 1	S. Hannush 2	S. Hannush 3	S. Hannush 4	S. Hannush 5
E. Arrondo	E. Arrondo 1	E. Arrondo 2	E. Arrondo 3	E. Arrondo 4	E. Arrondo 5
J. de la Cruz	J. de la Cruz 1	J. de la Cruz 2	J. de la Cruz 3	J. de la Cruz 4	J. de la Cruz 5

Question Title

* 11. General Comments and Suggestions: