Statewide Program Evaluation Fall 2023 Convening: Post-Session Survey

To help us improve our sessions, we hope you will take a few minutes to provide your feedback on the information that was shared. Thank you!

Question Title

* 1. Affiliation

CCEE

CDE/SBE

Evaluator/Other Attendee

Legislative/DOF/LAO Staff

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the QUALITY of the information that was shared in this session?

Was the session well-structured and designed? Did the session present content in an effective and engaging way that is easy to follow?

Very low quality – Poorly designed and hard to follow

Low quality – Not well-structured; hard to follow

Somewhat low quality – Slightly structured and engaging; sometimes difficult to follow

Somewhat high quality – Fairly structured; sometimes engaging and easy to follow

High quality – Engaging, well-designed, and easy to navigate

Very high quality – Very engaging and easy to follow; thoughtfully designed and developed

Question Title

* 3. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the QUALITY of information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the RELEVANCE of the information that was shared in this session?

Does the session clearly state its purpose/objectives? Is the session aimed at a specific audience? Does the session address an urgent issue, topic, or need? Does the session provide connections to your own projects/practices?

Very low relevance – Does not state purpose or intended audience; addresses a need that does not exist; no connections to own projects/practices

Low relevance – Purpose and intended audience unclear; aligns to an issue or topic that is not particularly relevant; unclear connections to own projects/practices

Somewhat low relevance – Purpose unclear; overly broad audience; addresses a generally acknowledged need; some connections to own projects/practices can be inferred

Somewhat high relevance – Clear purpose; overly broad audience; aligns to a relevant issue or topic; clear connections to own projects/practices

High relevance – Clear purpose; tailored to specific audience; timely in addressing a relevant issue, topic, or need; strong, clear connections to own projects/practices

Very high relevance – Clearly defined purpose; tailored to specific audience and context; addresses a highly relevant and urgent issue, topic, or need; strong, clear connections and implications for own projects/practices

Question Title

* 5. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the RELEVANCE of the information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate the USABILITY of the information that was shared in this session?

Can the information shared be immediately applied or implemented? Is the information shared applicable in multiple and diverse settings? Is the information shared accessible to all users in the intended audience? Does the information shared provide a comprehensive understanding of the content without overwhelming the user?

Very low usability – Cannot use or access this information

Low usability – Difficult to apply; requires a lot of adaptations to be used or accessed

Somewhat low usability – Can only be applied or accessed by some users

Somewhat high usability – Can be applied and accessed by most users with a few adaptations

High usability – Can be applied immediately and accessed by most users

Very high usability – Well-structured and comprehensive; can be applied immediately as is and accessed by all users

Question Title

* 7. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the USABILITY of the information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any additional feedback for future sessions?

Question Title

* 9. What is a helpful next step to continue aligning statewide evaluations to student-level program impact?

Question Title

* 10. Please share your availability for the Spring 2024 Convening. (Select all that apply)

April 2024

May 2024

June 2024

None of the above

Page1 / 1

100% of survey complete.

Statewide Program Evaluation Fall 2023 Convening: Post-Session Survey

Question Title

* 1. Affiliation

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the QUALITY of the information that was shared in this session?Was the session well-structured and designed? Did the session present content in an effective and engaging way that is easy to follow?

Question Title

* 3. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the QUALITY of information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

Question Title

* 5. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the RELEVANCE of the information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

Question Title

* 7. What specific improvements would you suggest to improve the USABILITY of the information that was shared in this session?

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any additional feedback for future sessions?

Question Title

* 9. What is a helpful next step to continue aligning statewide evaluations to student-level program impact?

Question Title

* 10. Please share your availability for the Spring 2024 Convening. (Select all that apply)

* 2. How would you rate the QUALITY of the information that was shared in this session?

Was the session well-structured and designed? Did the session present content in an effective and engaging way that is easy to follow?