San Mateo County Superior Court Multi-Option ADR Project ('MAP")

EVALUATION BY ATTORNEY
In accordance with Local Rule 3.905(c), please submit evaluations within 10 days of completion of the ADR process.

If your case did not settle, please note that effective 07/01/2021, Local Court Rule 3.905(b) requires parties to file a Statement of Nonagreement (ADR-CV-11) with the Court by the 90 ADR compliance deadline when the ADR session is unsuccessful in fully resolving the matter(s). This form facilitates setting cases for a Trial Setting Conference when ADR was unsuccessful in resolving the matter(s).

Statement of Nonagreement (ADR-CV-11) (ca.gov)

MAP staff and committees use this confidential information to assess the impact on the court, to track quality, to provide feedback to neutrals and to inform our decisions regarding redesign of program procedures. Other staff and trial judges do not see specific evaluations. This information will be aggregated for blind statistical reports to the Judicial Council, the Court and the community.

Question Title

Case Number:

Question Title

Type of Case

Question Title

Case Name:

Question Title

Name of Neutral:

Question Title

Date of Session:

Question Title

I am:

Question Title

I participated in an ADR session

Question Title

If you answered NO above, please indicate the reason(s) why below.

Question Title

Process(es) used in case (indicate all):

Question Title

Please indicate if the case resolved:

Question Title

If the case resolved, how much of a factor was ADR in settlement of the case?

1- Not a factor 5 - Very Important
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

Totals

Question Title

How many days elapsed (approximately between the filling of the complaint and the ADR session?

Question Title

Indicate at what phase the ADR session occurred (indicate if more than one)

Question Title

Which of the following court events were avoided because of the ADR session?

Question Title

In your opinion, using ADR in this case:

Question Title

In your opinion, using the ADR process in this case,

Question Title

Please estimate the number of days court time was reduced/increased as a result of the parties going to ADR:
(Consider the decrease /increase in the number of court days relative to motions, settlement conferences and trial.)

Question Title

Please indicate which, if any, of the following occurred during the ADR session: Please check all that apply.

Question Title

On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest level and 5 being the highest level, please indicate your satisfaction by rating the following statements:

  1 - Lowest 2 3 4 5 - Highest
This process was fair to all parties.
This process allowed all to be heard.
This process offered a safe secure setting.
My client did not feel unduly pressured by neutral to reach an agreement.
The neutral skillfully structured the process.
The neutral understood key issues.
I would use this neutral again.
I would use the MAP program again

Question Title

We welcome any other comments or suggestions you may have regarding the ADR neutral used in this case or the Multi-Option ADR Project:

( Privacy & Cookie Notice

T