Emory - GROUP LEADER – Law School Orientation Evaluation 2021 Survey

Question Title

* 1. Overall, my experience participating in the Professionalism Orientation program was:

1 - Poor

2 - Fair

3 - Average

4 - Good

5 - Excellent

1 - Poor

2 - Fair

3 - Average

4 - Good

5 - Excellent

Question Title

* 2. For 2021, how did you first learn about the Group Leader Interest Form registration

Commission's Facebook Page

Commission's Twitter Feed

General E-mail from the Commission

State Bar E-News/Website

Law School E-mail/Website/Social Media (no personal contact)

Personal E-mail/Call from Law School Faculty/Administrator/Staff

Forwarded e-mail from a Friend

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. Overall, how would you rate each of the following:

	1 - Poor	2 - Fair	3 - Average	4 - Good	5 - Excellent
General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program	General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program 1 - Poor	General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program 2 - Fair	General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program 3 - Average	General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program 4 - Good	General Format for the Professionalism Orientation Program 5 - Excellent
Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials)	Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials) 1 - Poor	Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials) 2 - Fair	Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials) 3 - Average	Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials) 4 - Good	Group Leader Handbook (Written Materials) 5 - Excellent
Group Leader Training	Group Leader Training 1 - Poor	Group Leader Training 2 - Fair	Group Leader Training 3 - Average	Group Leader Training 4 - Good	Group Leader Training 5 - Excellent

Comments:

Question Title

* 4. Was the length of the OVERALL Professionalism program

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Question Title

* 5. Please tell us how you felt about the information you received in the Group Leader Handbook (i.e. Written Materials):

	1 - Poor	2 - Fair	3 - Average	4 - Good	5 - Excellent
Group Leader Instructions	Group Leader Instructions 1 - Poor	Group Leader Instructions 2 - Fair	Group Leader Instructions 3 - Average	Group Leader Instructions 4 - Good	Group Leader Instructions 5 - Excellent
Information about Student Instructions	Information about Student Instructions 1 - Poor	Information about Student Instructions 2 - Fair	Information about Student Instructions 3 - Average	Information about Student Instructions 4 - Good	Information about Student Instructions 5 - Excellent
Agenda	Agenda 1 - Poor	Agenda 2 - Fair	Agenda 3 - Average	Agenda 4 - Good	Agenda 5 - Excellent
Hypothetical Descriptions	Hypothetical Descriptions 1 - Poor	Hypothetical Descriptions 2 - Fair	Hypothetical Descriptions 3 - Average	Hypothetical Descriptions 4 - Good	Hypothetical Descriptions 5 - Excellent
General Themes (Requested Talking Points)	General Themes (Requested Talking Points) 1 - Poor	General Themes (Requested Talking Points) 2 - Fair	General Themes (Requested Talking Points) 3 - Average	General Themes (Requested Talking Points) 4 - Good	General Themes (Requested Talking Points) 5 - Excellent
A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References	A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References 1 - Poor	A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References 2 - Fair	A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References 3 - Average	A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References 4 - Good	A Lawyer's Creed & Aspirational Statement on Professionalism References 5 - Excellent
Law School Honor Code References	Law School Honor Code References 1 - Poor	Law School Honor Code References 2 - Fair	Law School Honor Code References 3 - Average	Law School Honor Code References 4 - Good	Law School Honor Code References 5 - Excellent
Rules of Professional Conduct References	Rules of Professional Conduct References 1 - Poor	Rules of Professional Conduct References 2 - Fair	Rules of Professional Conduct References 3 - Average	Rules of Professional Conduct References 4 - Good	Rules of Professional Conduct References 5 - Excellent
Character and Fitness References	Character and Fitness References 1 - Poor	Character and Fitness References 2 - Fair	Character and Fitness References 3 - Average	Character and Fitness References 4 - Good	Character and Fitness References 5 - Excellent

Comments:

Question Title

* 6. Please tell us how you felt about the information you received during the Group Leader TRAINING on the day of the Orientation, for each of the following:

	1 - Poor	2 - Fair	3 - Average	4 - Good	5 - Excellent
Logistics Information	Logistics Information 1 - Poor	Logistics Information 2 - Fair	Logistics Information 3 - Average	Logistics Information 4 - Good	Logistics Information 5 - Excellent
Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group	Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group 1 - Poor	Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group 2 - Fair	Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group 3 - Average	Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group 4 - Good	Strategies for Facilitating the Break Out Group 5 - Excellent
Review of Hypos	Review of Hypos 1 - Poor	Review of Hypos 2 - Fair	Review of Hypos 3 - Average	Review of Hypos 4 - Good	Review of Hypos 5 - Excellent
Review of Reference Material	Review of Reference Material 1 - Poor	Review of Reference Material 2 - Fair	Review of Reference Material 3 - Average	Review of Reference Material 4 - Good	Review of Reference Material 5 - Excellent

Comments:

Question Title

* 7. Was the length of the GROUP LEADER TRAINING

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the information you received about the virtual meeting ID and members of your Break Out group?

1 - Poor

2 - Fair

3 - Average

4 - Good

5 - Excellent

1 - Poor

2 - Fair

3 - Average

4 - Good

5 - Excellent

Comments:

Question Title

* 9. To the best of your knowledge, did all of the students in your Break Out Group have the Student Materials?

Yes

Question Title

* 10. Please indicate any hypothetical problems your group did NOT discuss and tell us why.

My Group covered all of the hypothetical problem

Problem 1 - Class Registration

Problem 2 - Unfair Advantage?

Problem 3 - Social Behavior

Problem 4 - Adderall

Problem 5 - Social Media Usage

Problem 6 - Plagiarism

If you did not discuss all of the hypothetical problems, please tell us why.

Question Title

* 11. Of the hypothetical problems your group discussed, which hypothetical problems did you think were MOST EFFECTIVE for teaching professionalism? (1 is MOST Effective and 6 is LEAST Effective; Select "N/A" if your Group did not discuss a particular hypothetical problem)

Problem 1 - Class Registration

N/A

Problem 2 - Unfair Advantage?

N/A

Problem 3 - Social Behavior ("Briefs" Comment)

N/A

Problem 4 - Adderall

N/A

Problem 5 - Social Media Usage (College Cheating Scandal)

N/A

Problem 6 - Plagiarism

N/A

Question Title

* 12. Why did you consider the hypothetical problem you selected as MOST EFFECTIVE to be the most effective problem for teaching professionalism?

Question Title

* 13. Was the length of the BREAK OUT groups

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Too Long

Too Short

Just Right

Question Title

* 14. For 2022 (next year), how much advance notice of a SAVE THE DATE would you like from the Commission or the Law School if you are selected to serve as a Group Leader?

4+ weeks

3 weeks

2 weeks

1 week

Comments:

Question Title

* 15. For 2022 (next year), how far in advance would you like to receive the Group Leader Materials

14 days

10 days

7 days

Friday Before the Orientation even if less than 7 days

At least one business day in advance

Comments:

Emory - GROUP LEADER – Law School Orientation Evaluation 2021

Question Title

* 1. Overall, my experience participating in the Professionalism Orientation program was:

Question Title

* 2. For 2021, how did you first learn about the Group Leader Interest Form registration

Question Title

* 3. Overall, how would you rate each of the following:

Question Title

* 4. Was the length of the OVERALL Professionalism program

Question Title

* 5. Please tell us how you felt about the information you received in the Group Leader Handbook (i.e. Written Materials):

Question Title

* 6. Please tell us how you felt about the information you received during the Group Leader TRAINING on the day of the Orientation, for each of the following:

Question Title

* 7. Was the length of the GROUP LEADER TRAINING

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the information you received about the virtual meeting ID and members of your Break Out group?

Question Title

* 9. To the best of your knowledge, did all of the students in your Break Out Group have the Student Materials?

Question Title

* 10. Please indicate any hypothetical problems your group did NOT discuss and tell us why.

Question Title

* 11. Of the hypothetical problems your group discussed, which hypothetical problems did you think were MOST EFFECTIVE for teaching professionalism? (1 is MOST Effective and 6 is LEAST Effective; Select "N/A" if your Group did not discuss a particular hypothetical problem)

Question Title

* 12. Why did you consider the hypothetical problem you selected as MOST EFFECTIVE to be the most effective problem for teaching professionalism?

Question Title

* 13. Was the length of the BREAK OUT groups

Question Title

* 14. For 2022 (next year), how much advance notice of a SAVE THE DATE would you like from the Commission or the Law School if you are selected to serve as a Group Leader?

Question Title

* 15. For 2022 (next year), how far in advance would you like to receive the Group Leader Materials

Question Title

* 16. How could the professionalism orientation be improved?

Question Title

* 17. Please provide any other general suggestions or comments you have about the professionalism orientation.

Question Title

* 18. Your Name (Optional if you don't mind us contacting you if we have any follow-up questions about your responses).