CWMGR Evaluation – 2024-11-20 Survey

	Strongly agree	Somewhat agree	Equivocal	Somewhat disagree	Strongly disagree	N/A
Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly agree	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat agree	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat disagree	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly disagree	Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation N/A
Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly agree	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat agree	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat disagree	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly disagree	Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge N/A
Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly agree	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat agree	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Equivocal	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat disagree	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly disagree	Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic N/A
Presenter established a good rapport with the audience	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly agree	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat agree	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat disagree	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly disagree	Presenter established a good rapport with the audience N/A
At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly agree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat agree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat disagree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly disagree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning N/A
Presentation was balanced and unbiased.	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly agree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat agree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Equivocal	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat disagree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly disagree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. N/A

Strongly agree

Somewhat agree

Equivocal

Somewhat disagree

Strongly disagree

N/A

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly agree

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat agree

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat disagree

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly disagree

Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation N/A

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly agree

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat agree

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat disagree

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly disagree

Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge N/A

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly agree

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat agree

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Equivocal

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat disagree

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly disagree

Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about their topic N/A

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly agree

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat agree

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat disagree

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly disagree

Presenter established a good rapport with the audience N/A

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly agree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat agree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat disagree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly disagree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning N/A

Presentation was balanced and unbiased.

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly agree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat agree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Equivocal

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat disagree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly disagree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. N/A

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of this presenter?

Outstanding

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Comments for these presenters:

General Presenter Comments:

Question Title

* 3. What I liked most:

Question Title

* 4. What I learned from this session:

Question Title

* 5. Suggestions for change:

Question Title

* 6. Other general comments:

Question Title

* 7. As a result of these rounds (choose one that is most applicable):

I plan to make changes in my professional activity

These rounds validate my current knowledge, beliefs and current activity

I need more information before I will change my activity

This activity increased my knowledge or awareness of the topic

These rounds were not relevant to my practice

Please click the "Submit my feedback" button below to save your responses and be taken to the attendance collection survey.

Question Title

* 1. Drs. Heather MacNeill, Sofia Valanci Aroesty, & Ken Masters

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of this presenter?

Question Title

* 3. What I liked most:

Question Title

* 4. What I learned from this session:

Question Title

* 5. Suggestions for change:

Question Title

* 6. Other general comments:

Question Title

* 7. As a result of these rounds (choose one that is most applicable):