Skip to content
CWMGR Evaluation – 2024-01-17
1.
Michelle Hladunewich & Oleh Antonyshyn
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
Presenters provided
objectives or an outline
at the beginning of the presentation
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of
relevant knowledge
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
Presenters
stimulated enthusiasm
about their topic
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
Presenters established a
good rapport
with the audience
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
At least
25%
of the time was allocated to
interactive
learning
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
Presentation was
balanced and unbiased
.
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Equivocal
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
2.
What is your overall evaluation of these presenters?
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments for these presenters:
General Presenter Comments:
3.
What I liked most:
4.
What I learned from this session:
5.
Suggestions for change:
6.
Other general comments:
7.
As a result of these rounds (choose one that is most applicable):
I plan to make changes in my professional activity
These rounds validate my current knowledge, beliefs and current activity
I need more information before I will change my activity
This activity increased my knowledge or awareness of the topic
These rounds were not relevant to my practice
Please click the
"Submit my feedback"
button below to save your responses and be taken to the attendance collection survey.
