ASES 2023 Fellows' Day Friday, June 16th, 2023 Question Title * 1. Your overall impression of the ASES 2023 Fellows' Day was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 2. How would you rate the ASES Membership: Categories and Advancement session presented by Michael H. Amini, MD? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. How would you rate Keynote Speaker #1: Richard J. Hawkins, MD, FRSC? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 4. How would you rate Keynote Speaker #2: Steven S. Burkhart, MD? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 5. How would you rate Keynote Speaker #3: Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 6. How would you rate Symposium I: I'm Done with Fellowship, Now What? The Business of Starting A PracticeModerated by Anand M. Murthi, MD with a panel discussion including Brian R. Waterman, MD, Grant E. Garrigues, MD, Julia Lee, MD, Rachel M. Frank, MD Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 7. How would you rate Symposium II: Fractures - How to Handle the Cases My Partners Will Save Just for MeModerated by Michael H. Amini, MD and Justin W. Griffin, MD with a panel discussion including Oke A. Anakwenze, MD, MBA, Emilie V. Cheung, MD, Caroline M. Chebli, MD, Michael J. O'Brien, MD Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Podium Presentations Question Title * 8. Paper #1: Predictors of Poor and Excellent Outcomes Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis with Intact Rotator CuffThe overall quality of paper #1 presented by Abdulaziz Ahmed, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 9. Paper #2: High failure rate of two-stage revision for the infected total elbow arthroplasty: A single institution's experienceThe overall quality of paper #2 presented by Corey Schiffman, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 10. Paper #3: Glenoid Based Reference System to Differentiate Shoulder Pathologies on Plain RadiographsThe overall quality of paper #3 presented by Austin Smith, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 11. Paper #4: Pain Generation in the Contralateral Asymptomatic Shoulder in Patients with a Painful Cuff Tear: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort StudyThe overall quality of paper #4 presented by Jeffrey Olson, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 12. Paper #5: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension is Associated with Recurrent Instability Following Primary Arthroscopic Bankart RepairThe overall quality of paper #5 presented by Ting Cong, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 13. Paper #6: The Relationship Between Patient Resilience and Mental Health Status In Patients Undergoing Anatomic Shoulder ArthroplastyThe overall quality of paper #6 presented by James Levins, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 14. Paper #7: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Modular Segmental Metallic “Tumor” Prosthesis For Severe Proximal Humerus Bone LossThe overall quality of paper #7 presented by Joseph Labrum, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 15. Paper #8: How Anatomic Should Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Be?The overall quality of paper #8 presented by Ryan Hoffman, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 16. Paper #9: No Difference in 10-Year Survivorship of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral HeadThe overall quality of paper #9 presented by Joshua Thomas, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 17. Paper #10: Up To 8 Mm Of Glenoid-Sided Lateralization Does Not Increase The Risk Of Acromial Or Scapular Spine Stress Fracture Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With A 135° Humeral ComponentThe overall quality of paper #10 presented by Theresa Pak, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Next