Session Evaluation - CFAS AM 2019 - SYMPOSIUM II and Plenary

Please fill out the following information regarding the session VAN CAMPENHOUT SYMPOSIUM II – New Technologies Science, which took place on Friday, Sept. 20th, from 8:00 am to 10:30 am, and included the following the lectures listed below. Please also answer the questions regarding the Plenary Lecture which took place from 4:00 – 4:45 pm.

Plenary: Creating Embryos – Where Science May Lead Us in the Future 
Speaker: Gerald Schatten

SYMPOSIUM II Lectures
8:00 – 8:45 Keynote: The Personal Genome Project Canada: Discovery of Disease Susceptibility Genes
Speaker: Stephen Scherer

8:45 – 9:20 Lecture 1: Genome editing in mammalian embryos and beyond: Current state of the art and future potential
Speaker: Ben Davies

9:20 – 9:55 Lecture 2: New Insights on Clinical Aspects of PGT-A
Speaker: Richard Scott

9:55 – 10:30 Lecture 3: Imaging the Causes of Aneuploidy at the Beginning
Speaker: Greg FitzHarris

If needed, a link to the program can be found here.
1.Were the intended learning objectives for the lectures met [5 being clearly, effectively met, 1 being not met at all]?
2.The presentations were free from commercial bias, or any other form of inappropriate bias [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].
3.The information provided in the lecture was relevant to my practice [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].
4.Please score the overall delivery of the presentation content and audio visual [5 being exceptional, 1 being unsatisfactory].
5.The speakers communicated clearly [5 being very clear, 1 being incomprehensible].
6.The speakers were knowledgeable regarding their subject [5 being very knowledgeable, 1 being not knowledgeable at all].
7.The lectures promoted interaction (1 being no interaction, 5 being very interactive).
8.What did you learn from this session? Please specify the presenter's name or the talk title when referring to a specific talk.
9.What do you intend to incorporate into your workplace/practice? Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.
10.Overall, how would you rate this session (1 being unsatisfactory, 5 being exceptional)? Please explain.
11.Additional comments:
Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.
12.The plenary topic was suitable for a plenary lecture [1 being not suitable, 5 being very suitable].
Current Progress,
0 of 12 answered