Session Evaluation - CFAS AM 2019 - Saturday Concurrent Sessions

Please fill out the following information regarding the SATURDAY CONCURRENT SESSION(S) you attended, which took place on Saturday, Sept. 21st, from 1:30 pm to 3:30 pm. 

CONCURRENT SESSION A: IVF LABORATORY 
13:30 – 14:10 Safety in the IVF lab
Speaker: Rebecca Holmes

14:10 – 14:50 Artificial Intelligence and Automation in the IVF lab
Speaker: Cristina Hickman

14:50 – 15:30 Development of New Technologies for Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Speaker: Svetlana Madjunkova

CONCURRENT SESSION B: PHYSICIANS/NURSING/ADMINISTRATION 
13:30 – 14:10 Professional Development and Competency
Speaker: Zubin Austin

14:10 – 14:50 Assume Not: Providing High Quality Care for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals
Speaker: Molly Moravek

14:50 – 15:30 The Role of Social Media and the Internet in Fertility Practice
Speaker: Ron Harman King

CONCURRENT SESSION C: BASIC SCIENCE 
13:30 – 14:10 Y Chromosome Contribution to Spermatogenesis
Speaker: Monica Ward

14:10 – 14:50 Environmental Effects on Reproductive Health
Speaker: Patricia Hunt

14:50 – 15:30 Making Human Oocytes from Stem Cells
Speaker: Evelyn Telfer

CONCURRENT SESSION D: THIRD-PARTY REPRODUCTION 
13:30 – 14:10 Legal Aspects of Third-Party Reproduction in Canada - My Personal Experience
Speaker: Doreen Brown

14:10 – 14:50 Parenthood Through ART: Should There Be An Upper Age Limit?
Speaker: Julia Woodward

14:50 – 15:30 Bringing a legal challenge: Why the prohibition on paid gamete donation and surrogacy is probably unconstitutional
Speaker: Amir Attaran

If needed, a link to the program can be found here.
1.Please indicate which concurrent session(s) you attended on SATURDAY.
2.Were the intended learning objectives for the lectures met [5 being clearly, effectively met, 1 being not met at all]?
3.The presentations were free from commercial bias, or any other form of inappropriate bias [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].
4.The information provided in the lecture was relevant to my practice [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].
5.Please score the overall delivery of the presentation content and audio visual [5 being exceptional, 1 being unsatisfactory].
6.The speakers communicated clearly [5 being very clear, 1 being incomprehensible].
7.The speakers were knowledgeable regarding their subject [5 being very knowledgeable, 1 being not knowledgeable at all].
8.The lectures promoted interaction (1 being no interaction, 5 being very interactive).
9.What did you learn from this session? Please specify the presenter's name or the talk title when referring to a specific talk.
10.What do you intend to incorporate into your workplace/practice? Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.
11.Overall, how would you rate this session (1 being unsatisfactory, 5 being exceptional)? Please explain.
12.Additional comments:
Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.
Current Progress,
0 of 12 answered