CESA Post-Meeting Survey

Question Title

* 2. Overall, the quality of the presentations and discussions in the sessions were of interest to me and/or relevant to my organization.

Strongly Agree

Agree

No Opinion/ Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 3. Did you find the reception useful for networking with CESA members and meeting other DC-based individuals? (you can choose more than one response)

Yes, the reception is a useful activity for networking in DC

No, the reception was not useful

Yes, the reception is a useful activity and should also be included at other meetings

N/A - I didn't attend the reception

Comments?

Question Title

* 4. What did you find the most useful from the CESA meeting?

Question Title

* 5. What did you find the least interesting or useful about the CESA meeting?

Question Title

* 6. Are there any activities that we should include in future meetings that would improve this two-day event?

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the quality and usefulness of each session.

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	N/A
Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon)	Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon) Poor	Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon) Fair	Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon) Good	Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon) Excellent	Discussion of Program Successes and the Challenges Clean Energy Programs Face (Tutt, Lawrence, Walz, Leon) N/A
Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler)	Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler) Poor	Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler) Fair	Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler) Good	Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler) Excellent	Clean Energy Market Trends: The Big Picture (Zindler) N/A
Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak)	Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak) Poor	Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak) Fair	Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak) Good	Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak) Excellent	Market Trends for Key Technologies: Solar, Wind, and Natural Gas (Hensley, Margolis, Petak) N/A
National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes)	National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes) Poor	National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes) Fair	National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes) Good	National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes) Excellent	National Energy Policy: The View from Capitol Hill (Hayes) N/A
Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry)	Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry) Poor	Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry) Fair	Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry) Good	Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry) Excellent	Federal Policy and Clean Energy: A Panel Discussion (Gramlich, McCormick, Marciano, Terry) N/A
Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith)	Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Poor	Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Fair	Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Good	Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Excellent	Microgrids as a Resiliency Strategy (Clark, Joseph, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) N/A
State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith)	State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Poor	State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Fair	State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Good	State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) Excellent	State Energy Storage Policies and Program Tools (Comis, Nelson, Prideaux Smith) N/A
Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs	Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs Poor	Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs Fair	Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs Good	Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs Excellent	Innovation and State Clean Energy Programs N/A
Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile)	Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile) Poor	Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile) Fair	Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile) Good	Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile) Excellent	Locational Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Hile) N/A
Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff)	Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff) Poor	Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff) Fair	Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff) Good	Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff) Excellent	Solar Policy Trends: Rate Design, Net Metering, and the Value of Solar (Bird, Myers, Umoff) N/A
Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here?	Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here? Poor	Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here? Fair	Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here? Good	Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here? Excellent	Discussion: Where Do We Go from Here? N/A

Comments?

Question Title

* 8. Should future meetings include more opportunities to learn about what programs and projects members are working on?

Yes

Comments?

CESA Post-Meeting Survey - Spring 2017

Question Title

* 1. Please enter your contact info below.

Question Title

* 2. Overall, the quality of the presentations and discussions in the sessions were of interest to me and/or relevant to my organization.

Question Title

* 3. Did you find the reception useful for networking with CESA members and meeting other DC-based individuals? (you can choose more than one response)

Question Title

* 4. What did you find the most useful from the CESA meeting?

Question Title

* 5. What did you find the least interesting or useful about the CESA meeting?

Question Title

* 6. Are there any activities that we should include in future meetings that would improve this two-day event?

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the quality and usefulness of each session.

Question Title

* 8. Should future meetings include more opportunities to learn about what programs and projects members are working on?

Question Title

* 9. Please provide any information or suggestions that you may have regarding CESA meetings or our work going forward.