Mazama Spine 2018

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN

PT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. CME activities are required to be evidence based and bias free. Do you feel the presentations were balanced and free from commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well was the course objective met?

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
1. Assess medical conditions that impact the human spine.	1. Assess medical conditions that impact the human spine. Significantly Met	1. Assess medical conditions that impact the human spine. Somewhat Met	1. Assess medical conditions that impact the human spine. Not Met
2. Recommend treatment for their patients.	2. Recommend treatment for their patients. Significantly Met	2. Recommend treatment for their patients. Somewhat Met	2. Recommend treatment for their patients. Not Met
3. Acquire a greater understanding of more precise criteria for referring to surgical and non-surgical specialists for more advance treatment options.	3. Acquire a greater understanding of more precise criteria for referring to surgical and non-surgical specialists for more advance treatment options. Significantly Met	3. Acquire a greater understanding of more precise criteria for referring to surgical and non-surgical specialists for more advance treatment options. Somewhat Met	3. Acquire a greater understanding of more precise criteria for referring to surgical and non-surgical specialists for more advance treatment options. Not Met
4. Have a broader awareness of both conservative and surgical treatment options.	4. Have a broader awareness of both conservative and surgical treatment options. Significantly Met	4. Have a broader awareness of both conservative and surgical treatment options. Somewhat Met	4. Have a broader awareness of both conservative and surgical treatment options. Not Met
5. Have a broader awareness of new and innovative treatment options.	5. Have a broader awareness of new and innovative treatment options. Significantly Met	5. Have a broader awareness of new and innovative treatment options. Somewhat Met	5. Have a broader awareness of new and innovative treatment options. Not Met
6. Have a greater understanding of the outcomes potential for alternative treatment options.	6. Have a greater understanding of the outcomes potential for alternative treatment options. Significantly Met	6. Have a greater understanding of the outcomes potential for alternative treatment options. Somewhat Met	6. Have a greater understanding of the outcomes potential for alternative treatment options. Not Met

Additional comments:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Please identify how you will change your practice as a result of attending this activity (select all that apply).

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our speakers:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery	Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery Excellent	Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery Very Good	Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery Good	Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery Fair	Scott Becker, JD - Growth of Outpatient Spine Surgery Poor
Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery	Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery Excellent	Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery Very Good	Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery Good	Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery Fair	Ciara Harraher, MD - Metrics of Outpatient Spine Surgery Poor
Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient?	Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient? Excellent	Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient? Very Good	Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient? Good	Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient? Fair	Brian Gantwerker, MD - When is Outpatient not Outpatient? Poor
Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures	Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Excellent	Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Very Good	Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Good	Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Fair	Ken Nwosu, MD - Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Poor
Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery Excellent	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery Very Good	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery Good	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery Fair	Stephen Hochschuler, MD - Innovations in Outpatient Spine Surgery Poor
William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization	William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization Excellent	William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization Very Good	William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization Good	William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization Fair	William Tobler, MD - Outpatient Inter-laminar Decompression and Stabilization Poor
Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality	Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality Excellent	Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality Very Good	Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality Good	Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality Fair	Jens Chapman, MD - Spine Surgery: A Crisis of Perception or Reality Poor
Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective	Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective Excellent	Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective Very Good	Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective Good	Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective Fair	Tony Tohmeh, MD - MIS Spine Surgery - From the Skeptic Surgeon Perspective Poor
Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration	Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Excellent	Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Very Good	Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Good	Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Fair	Mick Perez-Cruet, MD - Stem Cell Based Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Poor
Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard	Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard Excellent	Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard Very Good	Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard Good	Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard Fair	Scott Blumenthal, MD - Outpatient Cervical ADR is Now the Gold Standard Poor
Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First	Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First Excellent	Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First Very Good	Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First Good	Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First Fair	Scott Lederhaus, MD - Ethics and Integrity: The Patient Comes First Poor
Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician	Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician Excellent	Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician Very Good	Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician Good	Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician Fair	Mike Wampold, JD - Informed Consent: The Patient's Right to Choose Their Physician Poor
David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries	David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries Excellent	David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries Very Good	David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries Good	David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries Fair	David Newell, MD - Concurrent Surgeries Poor
Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity	Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity Excellent	Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity Very Good	Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity Good	Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity Fair	Moustapha Abou-Samra, MD - Integrity Poor
Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case	Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case Excellent	Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case Very Good	Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case Good	Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case Fair	Gail Van Norman, MD - What are Ethics and Professionalism? Lessons from Conrad Murray and the Michael Jackson Case Poor
Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View	Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View Excellent	Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View Very Good	Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View Good	Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View Fair	Tom Jacobs, JD & Parker Reich, JD - Biomechanical Assessments: The Legal View Poor
Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research	Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research Excellent	Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research Very Good	Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research Good	Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research Fair	Robin Young - The Research Co-op: One Solution to Systemic Bias in Clinical Research Poor
Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data?	Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data? Excellent	Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data? Very Good	Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data? Good	Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data? Fair	Jens Chapman, MD - Risks of Spine Surgery - Do We Have Sufficient Data? Poor
Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions	Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions Excellent	Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions Very Good	Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions Good	Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions Fair	Stuart Massey - Efficiency, Predictability, Profitability Solutions Poor
Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update	Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update Excellent	Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update Very Good	Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update Good	Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update Fair	Frank Wessbecher, MD - Neuroradiology Update Poor
Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy	Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy Excellent	Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy Very Good	Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy Good	Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy Fair	Christina Julian, MD - Efficacy of Epidural PRP in Treating Radiculopathy Poor
Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market	Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market Excellent	Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market Very Good	Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market Good	Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market Fair	Jeff Dunkle - Delivering Value in New Healthcare Market Poor
Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation	Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation Excellent	Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation Very Good	Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation Good	Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation Fair	Doniel Drazin, MD - The Role of the Neurosurgeon in Technology Innovation Poor
Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis	Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Excellent	Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Very Good	Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Good	Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Fair	Ken Nwosu, MD - Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Poor
Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning	Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning Excellent	Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning Very Good	Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning Good	Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning Fair	Geoffrey Andrews, PhD, MBA - Eccelearning Poor
Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof	Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof Excellent	Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof Very Good	Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof Good	Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof Fair	Tony Tohmeh, MD - Rationale Behind Biologics... or Lack Thereof Poor
Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF	Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF Excellent	Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF Very Good	Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF Good	Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF Fair	Roland Kent, MD - Sagittal Balance and ACDF Poor

Additional comments:

Question Title

* 10. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 11. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 12. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Newsletter

Email Blast

Internet

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 14. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education (FORE) and South Sound Neurosurgery Research and Education Institute. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

AMA Credit Designation Statement: FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 9.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 9.75) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. CME activities are required to be evidence based and bias free. Do you feel the presentations were balanced and free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well was the course objective met?

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Please identify how you will change your practice as a result of attending this activity (select all that apply).

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our speakers:

Question Title

* 10. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 11. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 12. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 13. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)