Texas Literacy Initiative: Leadership Summit 2013

Texas Literacy Initiative Leadership Summit, February 11-12, San Antonio, Texas

Thank you for participating in the Texas Literacy Initiative Leadership Summit 2013. We appreciate your time in responding to the following questions and will use this information to improve future Summits. Best wishes, and we look forward to hearing from you!

Question Title

* 1. Leadership Summit Logistics and Content: Please indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with the following:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neither Agree Nor Disagree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized.	1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized. Strongly Agree	1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized. Agree	1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized. Disagree	1. The Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI) Leadership Summit schedule and registration process were clear and well-organized. Strongly Disagree
2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit.	2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit. Strongly Agree	2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit. Agree	2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit. Disagree	2. I was satisfied with San Antonio as the location for the Summit. Strongly Disagree
3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit.	3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit. Strongly Agree	3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit. Agree	3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit. Disagree	3. I was satisfied with the hotel accommodations for the Summit. Strongly Disagree
4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions.	4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions. Strongly Agree	4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions. Agree	4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions. Disagree	4. The Summit schedule provided adequate time for movement and/or transitions. Strongly Disagree
5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials.	5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials. Strongly Agree	5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials. Agree	5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials. Disagree	5. I was satisfied with the organization, presentation, availability and overall quality of Summit materials. Strongly Disagree
6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality.	6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality. Strongly Agree	6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality. Agree	6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality. Disagree	6. The Summit General Session presentation was of high-quality. Strongly Disagree
7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step.	7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Agree	7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Agree	7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Disagree	7. The Summit breakout sessions effectively addressed the implementation of the Texas State Literacy Plan (TSLP) and the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Disagree
8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals.	8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals. Strongly Agree	8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals. Agree	8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals. Disagree	8. Day 1: Session 1 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity for Literacy Line leaders to reflect on instructional leadership, systemic improvement, site/campus plans, Implementation Maps and goals. Strongly Disagree
9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step.	9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Agree	9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Agree	9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Disagree	9. Day 1: Session 2 was high-quality and helped me to learn the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Disagree
10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step.	10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Agree	10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Agree	10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Disagree	10. Day 2: Session 3 was high-quality and helped me to practice the process for working on a TSLP Action Step. Strongly Disagree
11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI.	11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI. Strongly Agree	11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI. Agree	11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI. Neither Agree Nor Disagree	11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI. Disagree	11. Day 2: Session 4 was high-quality and provided a good opportunity to begin working on a TSLP Action Step, to prepare for "turning-around" the Summit, and to learn about next steps for TLI. Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 2. Leadership Summit Scheduling

	Early December	January 1-15	January 15-31	February 1-14	February 15-28
12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.)	12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.) Early December	12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.) January 1-15	12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.) January 15-31	12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.) February 1-14	12. To assist with the scheduling of next year's Leadership Summit, please indicate which time period would be your first choice for the Summit to take place. (If you want to provide comments related to the scheduling of the Summit, please use the "Additional Comments" box below.) February 15-28

Texas Literacy Initiative: Leadership Summit 2013

Question Title

* 1. Leadership Summit Logistics and Content: Please indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with the following:

Question Title

* 2. Leadership Summit Scheduling

Question Title

* 3. For you, what was the most successful/helpful aspect of the Summit?

Question Title

* 4. What would have made the Summit a more positive experience for you?

Question Title

* 5. Additional Comments: